Wharton, Sue. (2007) Social identity and parallel text dynamics in the reporting of educational action research. English for Specific Purposes, Vol.26 (No.4). pp. 485-501. ISSN 0889-4906

PDF WRAP_Wharton_Wharton_ESP_8_Sept.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (251Kb)

Abstract

This paper focuses on textual issues in the reporting of action research. There exists a large body of text-analytical work on research reports from various fields, examining for example the organisation and rhetorical purpose of research articles or sections thereof. However, less has been done on the specific issues of reporting action research, and this paper seeks to fill that gap by an exploration of text dynamics in action research reports. It focuses on three small corpora of educational action research reports: page-length reports intended to share classroom practice, medium-length article reports which situate pedagogic interventions in some detail, and lastly, full length research article reports. The research discussed in this paper indicates possible relationships between text patterns and action research processes, and facilitates examination of the issues involved when attempting to represent a cyclical and often recursive process in textual form. It allows an exploration of the textually articulated relationships between the researcher and other aspects of the research context, be they structures or actors. This is a particularly complex and important issue in action research where groundedness, collaboration, appropriacy and reflexivity are key values. The paper has teacher education implications. Given the role of action research modules on in service teacher education programmes there is a need to facilitate, for new action researchers, an insight into forms of discourse that may assist them to articulate their experiences. To be of maximum benefit, such insights should also be educational in the sense of facilitating the development of discursive literacy.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Action research in education, Group identity -- Great Britain, Research -- Methodology, Grounded theory, Reflective learning
Journal or Publication Title:	English for Specific Purposes
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0889-4906
Date:	15 February 2007
Volume:	Vol.26
Number:	No.4
Page Range:	pp. 485-501
Identification Number:	10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.003
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Allwright, D. & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Allwright, D. (1993). Integrating 'research ' and 'pedagogy: appropriate criteria and practical possibilities. In J. Edge & K. Richards (Eds.) Teachers develop teachers research, (pp 125-135). Oxford: Heinemann. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for classroom research: the case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 3, 353-366. Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work London: Routledge. Arreman, I. (2005). Research as power and knowledge: struggles over research in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31, 3, 215-235. Bal, M. (1997). Narratology: introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Brown, T. & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism. Buckingham: Open University Press. Burns, A. (2005a). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, (pp. 241-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Burns, A. (2005b). Action research: an evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38, 2, 57-74. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: knowing through action research. London: The Falmer Press. Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly 29, 1, 9-26. Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14, 2, 130-144. Delandshere, G. (2004). The moral, social and political responsibility of educational researchers: resisting the current quest for certainty. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 3, 237-256. Edge, J. (2001). Attitude and access: building a new teaching/learning community in TESOL. In J. Edge (Ed), Action research: case studies in TESOL practice series, (pp. 1-11). Alexandria, Virginia, USA: TESOL inc. Edge, J. & Wharton, S. (2002). Genre teaching: the struggle for diversity in unity. In K. Miller and P. Thompson (Eds.), Unity and Diversity in Language Use (pp. 22-38). London: BAAL/ Continuum. Edge, J. (2003). Alternative discourses. ELT Journal, 57, 4, 386-394. Edge, J. (in preparation). Acquiring the textual dynamic of action research. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research and educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. Foster, P. (1999). Never mind the quality, feel the impact: a methodological assessment of teacher research sponsored by the teacher training agency. British Journal of Educational Studies 41, 4, 380-398. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research. From inquiry to understanding. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Green, S.K, & Brown, M. (2006). Promoting action research and problem solving among teacher candidates: one elementary school‟s journey. Action in Teacher Education, 27, 4, 45-54. Hayes, D. (1996). Prioritising “voice” over “vision”: reaffirming the centrality of the teacher in ESOL research. System, 24, 2, 173-186. Heron, J. (1996). Cooperative inquiry: research into the human condition. London: Sage. Hoey, M. (2001). Interaction in text: an introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge. Hopkins, D. (2002). A teacher’s guide to classroom research (3rd ed). Buckingham: Open University Press. Hymes, D. (1986). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35-71). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Jarvis, S. (2001). Research in TESOL: sunset or a new dawn? TESOL Research Interest Section Newsletter, 8, 2, 1-7. Maclure, M. (2003). Discourse analysis in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press. Mann, S. (2005). The language teacher‟s development. Language Teaching, 38, 3, 103-118. McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. Modern Language Journal, 90, 1, 33-47. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. London: Prentice-Hall. Pearce, S. (2004). The development on one teacher‟s understanding of practitioner research in a multi ethnic primary school. Educational Action Research, 12, 1, 7-18. Pike, M. (2002). Action research for English teaching: ideology, pedagogy and personal growth. Educational Action Research 10, 1, 27-44. Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum. Rainey, I. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8, 1, 65-91. Roulston, K., Legette, R., DeLoach, M., & Pittman, C. B. (2005). What is research for teacher researchers? Educational Action Research, 13, 2, 169-190. Rué, J. (2006). Reconstructing teaching professionalism in the new modernity: an agenda for new action narratives. Educational Action Research, 14, 1, 119-138. Somekh, B. (2006). Constructing intercultural knowledge and understanding through collaborative action research. Teachers and Teaching, 12, 1, 87-106. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thorne, M. & Wang, Q. (1996). Action research in teacher education. ELT Journal, 50, 3, 254-262. Wharton, S. (2005). Parallel dynamics in research and discourse. IATEFL Research News, 16, 4-10. Winter, R. (1998). Managers, spectators and citizens: where does „theory‟ come from in action research? Educational Action Research, 6, 3. 361-376. Examples from TESOL Journal Gerdes, C. & Wilberschied, L. (2003). Workplace ESL: effective adaptations to fill a growing need. TESOL Journal, 12, 3, 41-46. Hayward, N. M. & Tuzi, F. (2003). Confessions of a technophobe and a technophile: the changing perspectives of technology in ESL. TESOL Journal, 12, 1, 3-8. Quinlisk, C. C. (2003). Media literacy in the ESL/EFL classroom: reading images and cultural stories. TESOL Journal, 12, 3, 35-40. Vann, R. J., & Fairbairn, S. B. (2003). Linking our worlds: a collaborative academic literacy project. TESOL Journal, 12, 3, 11-16. Van Wyk, A. (2003). Access to higher education in South Africa: bridging the divide through academic literacy. TESOL Journal, 12, 3, 29-34. Examples from Educational Action Research Gransden, B. (2004). Reflections on teaching observations and the use of a personal development journal in medical teacher education Educational Action Research, 12, 1, 19-32. Gravett, S. (2004). Action research and transformative learning in teaching development. Educational Action Research, 12, 2, 259-272. Halai, A. (2004). Action research to study classroom impact: is it possible? Educational Action Research, 12, 4, 515-534 LaMaster, K. J., & Knop, N. (2004). Improving web-based instruction: using action research to enhance distance learning instruction Educational Action Research, 12, 3, 387-412. Lee, V., & Coombs, S. J. (2004). Applying self-organised learning to develop critical thinkers for learning organizations: a conversational action research project Educational Action Research, 12, 3, 363-386. Meyer, H., Hamilton, B., Kroeger, S., Stewart, S., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2004). The unexpected journey: renewing our commitment to students through educational action research Educational Action Research 12, 4, 557-574. Nixon, D., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Building bridges: using science as a tool to teach reading and writing. Educational Action Research 12, 2, 197-218. Smith, J. D. N. (2004). Developing paired teaching placements. Educational Action Research 12, 1, 99-126.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3288

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item