Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Validity and reliability of the DMSES UK : a measure of self-efficacy for type 2 diabetes self-management

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sturt, Jackie, Hearnshaw, Hilary and Wakelin, M.. (2010) Validity and reliability of the DMSES UK : a measure of self-efficacy for type 2 diabetes self-management. Primary Health Care Research and Development, Vol.11 (No.4). pp. 374-381. ISSN 1463-4236

[img] Text
WRAP_Sturt_Reliability_and_validity.pdf - Draft Version

Download (152Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423610000101

Abstract

Objectives Self-efficacy is an important outcome measure of self-management interventions. We aimed to establish UK validity and reliability of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale (DMSES). Methods The 20 item DMSES was available for Dutch and US populations. Consultation with people with type 2 diabetes and health professionals established UK content and face validity resulting in item reduction to 15. Participants were adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the diabetes manual, a self-management education intervention, with an HbA1c over 7% and who understood English. Baseline trial data and follow-up control group data were used. Results A total of 175 participants completed all 15 items. Pearson’s correlation coefficient of −0.46 (P < 0.0001) between the DMSES UK and the problem areas in diabetes scale demonstrated criterion validity. Intra-class correlation between data from 67 of these participants was 0.77, demonstrating test-retest reliability. The correlation coefficients between item scores and total scores were >0.30. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89 over all items. Conclusion This evaluation demonstrates that the scale has good internal reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, criterion validity, and test-retest reliability. Practice Implications The 15 item DMSES UK is suitable for use in research and clinical settings to measure the self-efficacy of people living with type 2 diabetes in managing their diabetes.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Metabolic and Vascular Health
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Non-insulin-dependent diabetes, Patient self-monitoring, Clinical trials -- Great Britain, Medical care -- Evaluation
Journal or Publication Title: Primary Health Care Research and Development
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1463-4236
Date: 22 June 2010
Volume: Vol.11
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 374-381
Identification Number: 10.1017/S1463423610000101
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Diabetes UK, Great Britain. Dept. of Health (DoH)
References: Anderson, R.M., Funnell, M.M., Fitzgerald, A.T. and Marrero, D.G. 2000: The diabetes empowerment scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care 23, 739–43. Bandura, A. 1977: Self-efficacy theory: towards a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review 84, 191–215. Bandura, A. 1994: Self-efficacy. In Ramachaudran, V.S., editor, Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Academic Press, 71–81. Bandura, A. 1997: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, A. 2006: Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Pajares, F. and Urdan, T. editors, Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing, 307–37. Bijl, V.J., Poelgeest-Eeltink, A.V. and Shortridge-Baggett, L. 1999: The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30, 352–59. Dale, J., Caramlau, I., Sturt, J., Friede, T. and Walker, R. 2009: Telephone peer-delivered intervention for diabetes motivation and support: the telecare exploratory RCT. Patient Education and Counselling 75, 91–98. Davies, M.J., Heller, S., Skinner, T.C., Campbell, M.J., Carey, M.E., Cradock, S., Dallosso, H.M., Daly, H., Doherty, Y., Eaton, S., Fox, C., Oliver, L., Rantell, K., Rayman, G. and Khunti, K. 2008: Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 336, 491–95. Day, J.L., Bodmer, C.W. and Dunn, O.M. 1997: Development of a questionnaire identifying factors responsible for successful self-management of insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 13, 564–73. Department of Health. 2002: The national service framework for diabetes standards document. London: Department of Health. Department of Health. 2005: Structured patient education in diabetes: report from the patient education working group, 2005. London: Department of Health. Donaldson, L. 2003: Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS. BMJ 326, 1279–80. Farmer, A., Wade, A., French, D.P., Goyder, E., Kinmonth, A.L. and Neil, A. 2005: The DiGEM rial protocol – a randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on glycaemic control of different strategies of blood glucose self-monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes [ISRCTN47464659]. BMC Family Practice 6, 1–8. Fisher, E.B., Thorpe, C.T., Devellis, B.M. and Devellis, R.F. 2007: Healthy coping, negative emotions, and diabetes management: a systematic review and appraisal. Diabetes Educator 33, 1080–103. Gillis, A.J. 1993: Determinants of health promoting lifestyle; an integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18, 545–53. Guevara, J.P., Wolf, F.M., Grum, C.M. and Clark, N.M. 2003: Effects of educational interventions for self management of asthma in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal 326, 1308–309. International Diabetes Federation. 2003: International standards for diabetes education. Retrieved 30 April 2009 from www.idf.org/webdata/docs/International%20standards.pdf Lindenmeyer, A., Hearnshaw, H. and Sturt, J. 2007: Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the warwick diabetes care research user group: a qualitative case study. Health Expectations 10, 268–77. Lloyd, C.E., Sturt, J., Johnson, M., Mughal, S., Collins, G. and Barnett, A.H. 2008: Development of alternative methods of data collection in South Asians with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 25, 455–62. Lorig, K.R., Sobel, D.S., Stewart, A.L., Brown, B.W. Jr., Bandura, A., Ritter, P., Gonzalez, V.M., Laurent, D.D. and Holman, H.R. 1999: Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management programme can improve health status whilst reducing hospitalisation. A randomised trial. Medical Care 37, 5–14. McDowell, J., Courtney, M., Edwards, H. and Shortridge- Bagget, H. 2005: Validation of the Australian/English version of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale. International Journal of Nursing Practice 11, 177–84. Norris, S.L., Engelgau, M.M. and Venkat Narayan, K.M. 2001: Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Care 24, 561–87. Pajares, F., Hartley, J. and Valiante, G. 2001: Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: greater discrimination increases prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 33, 214–21. Polonsky, W.H., Anderson, B.J., Lohrer, P.A., Welch, G., Jacobson, A.M., Aponte, J.E. and Schwartz, C.E. 1995: Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 18, 754–60. Sentcal, C., Nouwen, A. and White, D. 2000: Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: are selfefficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs? Health Psychology 19, 452–57. Shortridge-Bagget, L.M. and van der Bijl, J.J. 2002: Measurement of significant others self-efficacy in diabetes management. In Sigma Theta Tau International Conference, Brisbane. Sniehotta, F.F., Scholzu, U. and Schwarzer, R. 2005: Bridging the intention – behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology and Health 20, 143–60. Sturt, J., Hearnshaw, H., Farmer, A., Dale, J. and Eldridge, S. 2006a: The diabetes manual trial protocol – a cluster randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for type 2 diabetes [ISRCTN06315411]. BMC Family Practice 7.45. Sturt, J., Taylor, H., Docherty, A., Dale, J. and Louise, T. 2006b: A psychological approach for providing selfmanagement education for people with type 2 diabetes: the diabetes manual. BMC Family Practice 7.70. Sturt, J.A., Whitlock, S., Fox, C., Hearnshaw, H., Farmer, A.J., Wakelin, M., Eldridge, S., Griffiths, F. and Dale, J. 2008: Effects of the diabetes manual 1:1 structured education in primary care. Diabetic Medicine 25, 722–31. Van Der Ven, N.C., Weinger, K., Yi, J., Pouwer, F., Ader, H., Van Der Ploeg, H.M. and Snoek, F.J. 2003: The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26, 713–18. Welch, G., Weinger, K., Anderson, B. and Polonsky, W.H. 2003: Responsiveness of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabetic Medicine 20, 69–72.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3292

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us