Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

International organizations, security dichotomies and the trafficking of persons and narcotics in post-soviet central Asia : a critique of the securitization framework

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Jackson, Nicole J. (2006) International organizations, security dichotomies and the trafficking of persons and narcotics in post-soviet central Asia : a critique of the securitization framework. Security Dialogue, Volume 37 (Number 3). pp. 299-317. doi:10.1177/0967010606069062

Full text not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010606069062

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article offers a constructive critique of the Copenhagen School's 'securitization' framework by applying it in an analysis of the role of international organizations seeking to counter the trafficking of narcotics and persons in post-Soviet Central Asia. The study discovers common and divergent motivations that explain international attempts and failures to securitize. In the case of human trafficking, significant clashes created obstacles to international efforts. In both cases, international organizations advanced their agendas through the language of security, but also through institutional changes and increased resource allocation. These processes led to the adoption of mostly traditional security strategies. The analysis concludes that although the securitization framework makes significant contributions as an analytical tool, its definition is too vague and it is too narrow in focus. 'Security dichotomies' need to be taken into account in a comprehensive analysis of why international attempts to securitize issues sometimes succeed and sometimes fail. The influence of rhetoric on the development of policy should also be taken into account if the securitization framework is to provide a complete understanding of the issues or be useful for policymakers.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Journal or Publication Title: Security Dialogue
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0967-0106
Official Date: September 2006
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2006Published
Volume: Volume 37
Number: Number 3
Number of Pages: 19
Page Range: pp. 299-317
DOI: 10.1177/0967010606069062
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@live.warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us