The Library
Do elections always motivate incumbents? Learning vs. re-election concerns
Tools
Le Borgne, Eric and Lockwood, Ben. (2006) Do elections always motivate incumbents? Learning vs. re-election concerns. PUBLIC CHOICE, 129 (1-2). pp. 41-60. ISSN 0048-5829
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-0863-6
Abstract
This paper studies a principal-agent model of the relationship between office-holder and an electorate, where everyone is initially uninformed about the office-holder's ability. If office-holder effort and ability interact in the determination of performance in office, then an office-holder has an incentive to learn, i.e., raise effort so that performance becomes a more accurate signal of her ability. Elections reduce the learning effect, and the reduction in this effect may more than offset the positive "re-election concerns" effect of elections on effort, implying higher effort with appointment. When this occurs, appointment of officials may welfare-dominate elections.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
| Journal or Publication Title: | PUBLIC CHOICE |
| Publisher: | SPRINGER |
| ISSN: | 0048-5829 |
| Date: | October 2006 |
| Volume: | 129 |
| Number: | 1-2 |
| Number of Pages: | 20 |
| Page Range: | pp. 41-60 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1007/s11127-006-0863-6 |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/33013 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

