Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Modelling predation in functional response

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Fenlon, John S. and Faddy, Malcolm J.. (2006) Modelling predation in functional response. Ecological Modelling, Vol.198 (No.1-2). pp. 154-162. ISSN 0304-3800

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.002

Abstract

Functional response is important in understanding the dynamics of predator-prey systems-it is essentially the interpretation of a bio-assay system in which individual predators have access to fixed numbers of prey for a given period of time. The classical approach to the problem has entailed the use of mechanistic models to interpret the data, but more recently several papers have argued that the use of simple logistic regression is both more consistent with the nature of the data and allows for the stochastic variation inherent in the system. Nevertheless, both the classical approach and this newer interpretation focus only on the modelling of means, and ignore the variability of the data. Another overlooked difficulty is that many published data sets display over-dispersion which itself may be a function of prey density In this paper we present some models which, as well as modelling the mean response, also account for the over-dispersion. The beta-binomial is a common model for admitting extra-variation, and here we develop some variants that allow a dependency on prey density. We also develop some new models based on stochastic counting processes. These models are compared and contrasted on a strict likelihood basis. It is found that beta-binomial models provide a markedly better fit to the data than do simple binomial models. The best-fitting counting process model is almost as good (in likelihood terms) as the best-fitting beta-binomial model. We argue that the counting process models offer richer insights into the predation process than do the other more 'descriptive' models. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Journal or Publication Title: Ecological Modelling
Publisher: Elsevier BV
ISSN: 0304-3800
Date: 15 September 2006
Volume: Vol.198
Number: No.1-2
Number of Pages: 9
Page Range: pp. 154-162
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.002
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/33037

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us