Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Decline in effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids with time to birth : real or artefact?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gates, Simon and Brocklehurst, Peter. (2010) Decline in effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids with time to birth : real or artefact? BMJ, Vol.335 (No.7610). pp. 77-79. ISSN 0959-535X

[img] PDF
WRAP_Gates_decline.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (160Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39225.677708.80

Abstract

The effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids to prevent neonatal lung disease in women at risk of preterm birth was established by systematic reviews. In addition, subgroup analyses suggested that treatment was most effective in babies born one to seven days after administration. This belief led to widespread use of repeated courses of corticosteroids in women who did not deliver within a week or two of initial treatment. However, the notion that effectiveness declines after seven days may be incorrect, as the analyses that it is based on are unreliable. Here, we discuss the methodological problems of these analyses and their relevance to current randomised controlled trials of repeated versus single courses.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Adrenocortical hormones, Premature infants -- Diseases, Fetus -- Effect of drugs on, Lungs -- Diseases, Pulmonary pharmacology
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ
Publisher: BMJ Group
ISSN: 0959-535X
Date: 14 July 2010
Volume: Vol.335
Number: No.7610
Page Range: pp. 77-79
Identification Number: 10.1136/bmj.39225.677708.80
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Great Britain. Dept. of Health (DoH)
References: 1 Crowley P. Promoting pulmonary maturity. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:746-64. 2 Crowley P. The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:11-25. 3 Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:322-35. 4 Liggins GC, Howie RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 1972;50:515-25. 5 Howie RN, Liggins GC. Clinical trial of antepartum betamethasone therapy for prevention of respiratory distress in pre-term infants. In: Anderson ABM, Beard RW, Brudenell JM, Dunn PM, eds. Pre-term labour. London: RCOG, 1977:281-9. 6 Jobe AH. Glucocorticoids, inflammation and the perinatal lung. Semin Neonatol 2001;6:331-42. 7 Grier DG, Halliday HL. Effects of glucocorticoids on fetal and neonatal lung development. Treat Respir Med 2004;3:295-306. 8 Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD004454. 9 Brocklehurst P, Gates S, McKenzie-McHarg K, Alfirevic Z, Chamberlain G. Are we using multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids? A survey of practice in the UK. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:977-9. 10 Quinlivan JA, Evans SF, Dunlop SA, Beazley LD, Newnham JP. Use of corticosteroids by Australian obstetricians—a survey of clinical practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;38:1-7. 11 Crowther CA, Harding JE. Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for preventing neonatal respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD003935. 12 Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Thom EA, Johnson F, Dudley DJ, Spong CY, et al. Single versus weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:633-42. 13 Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Hiller JE, Doyle LW, Robinson JS; Australasian Collaborative Trial of Repeat Doses of Steroids (ACTORDS) Study Group. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:1913-9. 14 Monton S, Arukumaran S. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet 2006;367:1878-9. 15 NIH Consensus Development Panel. Antenatal corticosteroids revisited: repeat courses—National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement, August 17-18, 2000. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:144-50. 16 Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, eds. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001. 17 Rochon J. Issues in adjusting for covariates arising postrandomisation in clinical trials. Drug Inform J 1999;33:1219-28. 18 Van Walraven C, Davis D, Forster AJ, Wells GA. Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:672-82. 19 Guinn DA, Atkinson MW, Sullivan L, Lee M, Macgregor S, Parilla BV, et al. Single vs weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm delivery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286:1581-7.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3328

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us