The Library

Predators reduce extinction risk in noisy metapopulations

Tools

Bull, James C. and Bonsall, Michael B.. (2010) Predators reduce extinction risk in noisy metapopulations. PL o S One, Vol.5 (No.7). ISSN 1932-6203

PDF
WRAP_Bull_predators_reduce.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1378Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011635

Abstract

Background Spatial structure across fragmented landscapes can enhance regional population persistence by promoting local “rescue effects.” In small, vulnerable populations, where chance or random events between individuals may have disproportionately large effects on species interactions, such local processes are particularly important. However, existing theory often only describes the dynamics of metapopulations at regional scales, neglecting the role of multispecies population dynamics within habitat patches. Findings By coupling analysis across spatial scales we quantified the interaction between local scale population regulation, regional dispersal and noise processes in the dynamics of experimental host-parasitoid metapopulations. We find that increasing community complexity increases negative correlation between local population dynamics. A potential mechanism underpinning this finding was explored using a simple population dynamic model. Conclusions Our results suggest a paradox: parasitism, whilst clearly damaging to hosts at the individual level, reduces extinction risk at the population level.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Population biology -- Statistical methods, Parasitoids -- Mathematical models, Bruchidae -- Mathematical models, Predation (Biology), Extinction (Biology)
Journal or Publication Title:	PL o S One
Publisher:	Public Library of Science
ISSN:	1932-6203
Date:	21 July 2010
Volume:	Vol.5
Number:	No.7
Identification Number:	10.1371/journal.pone.0011635
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Natural Environment Research Council (Great Britain) (NERC)
Grant number:	NER/A/S/2000/01288 (NERC)
References:	1. Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersing factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27: 343–383. 2. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15: 237–240. 3. Comins HN, Hassell MP (1987) The dynamics of predation and competition in patchy environments. Theor Pop Biol 31: 393–421. 4. Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42: 3–16. 5. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. London: Academic Press. 6. Comins HN, Hassell MP, May RM (1992) The spatial dynamics of hostparasitoid systems. J Anim Ecol 61: 735–748. 7. Comins HN, Hassell MP (1996) Persistence of multispecies host-parasitoid interactions in spatially distributed models with local dispersal. J Theor Biol 183: 19–23. 8. Wilson HB, Hassell MP (1997) Host-parasitoid spatial models: the interplay of demographic stochasticity and dynamics. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 264: 1189–1195. 9. Dey S, Joshi A (2006) Stability via asynchrony in Drosophila metapopulations with low migration rates. Science 312: 434–436. 10. Holyoak M, Lawler SP (1996) The role of dispersal in predator-prey metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 65: 640–652. 11. Bonsall MB, Bull JC, Pickup NJ, Hassell MP (2005) Indirect effects and spatial scaling affect the persistence of multispecies metapopulations. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 272: 1465–1471. 12. Bull JC, Pickup NJ, Hassell MP, Bonsall MP (2006) Habitat shape, metapopulation processes and the dynamics of multispecies predator-prey interactions. J Anim Ecol 75: 899–907. 13. Bull JC, Pickup NJ, Pickett B, Hassell MP, Bonsall MB (2007) Metapopulation extinction risk is increased by environmental stochasticity and assemblage complexity. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 274: 87–96. 14. Bull JC, Bonsall MB (2008) Overcompensatory population dynamic responses to environmental stochasticity. J Anim Ecol 77: 1296–1305. 15. Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theoret Pop Ecol 12: 197–229. 16. Bonsall MB, Hassell MP (1997) Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages. Nature 388: 371. 17. Holt RD (1997) Community modules. In: Gange A, Brown VK, eds. Multitrophic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp 333–350. 18. Royama T (1992) Analytical population dynamics. London: Chapman & Hall. 19. Box GEP & Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J Roy Stat Soc B 26: 211–252. 20. Bjørnstad ON, Begon M, Stenseth NC, Falck W, Sait SM, et al. (1998) Population dynamics of the Indian Meal Moth: Demographic stochasticity and delayed regulatory mechanisms. J Anim Ecol 67: 110–126. 21. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc. 22. Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1998) Ecological Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 23. Allee WC (1931) Animal aggregations: a study in general sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 24. Courchamp F, Gascogne J, Berek L (2008) Allee effects in ecology and conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 26. Brown JH, Kodrick-Brown A (1997) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445. 27. Amarasekare P (1998) Allee effects in metapopulation dynamics. Am Nat 152: 298–302. 28. Zhou S-R, Wang G (2004) Allee-like effects in metapopulation dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences 189: 103–113. 29. Ranta E, Lundberg P, Kaitala V, Laakso J (2000) Visibility of the environmental noise modulating population dynamics. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 267: 1851–1856. 30. Benton TG, Lapsley CT, Beckerman AP (2002) The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system. J Anim Ecol 71: 320. 31. Rosenzweig M (1971) The paradox of enrichment. Science 171: 385–387. 32. May RM (1974) Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations – stable points, stable cycles and chaos. Science 186: 645–647. 33. Earn DJD, Levin SA, Rohani P (2000) Coherence and conservation. Science 290: 1360–1364. 34. Vogwill T, Fenton A, Brockhurst MA (2009) Dispersal and natural enemies interact to drive spatial synchrony and decrease stability in patchy populations. Ecol Letts 12: 1194–1200. 35. Hudson PJ, Dobson AP, Newborn D (1998) Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science 282: 2256–2258. 36. Liebhold A, Koenig WD, Bjornstad ON (2004) Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 467–490.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3340