Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED. (2006) Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 55 (1). pp. 89-101. ISSN 0749-596X

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.004

Abstract

Relation priming is a phenomenon in which comprehension of a word pair (e.g.. COPPER HORSE) is facilitated by the prior presentation of another word pair (e.g., GLASS EYE) that instantiates the same conceptual relation (i.e.. composed of). We investigated whether relation priming is contingent on lexical similarity. Study I revealed that relational similarity, but not lexical similarity, reliably predicted noun phrase comprehension across several previously published experiments. Study 2 demonstrated relation priming between lexically dissimilar phrases (e.g.. STEEL SCISSORS -> STRAW HAT). Thus, across both studies, lexical similarity failed to explain relation printing. Rather, comprehension of a target phrase was a function of its relational similarity to the prime phrase. Results are inconsistent with models in which conceptual relations are bound to the particular concepts that instantiate them. and suggest instead that conceptual relations are independent representational units that can be utilized by various and dissimilar concepts. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: P Language and Literature
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Journal or Publication Title: JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
Publisher: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
ISSN: 0749-596X
Date: July 2006
Volume: 55
Number: 1
Number of Pages: 13
Page Range: pp. 89-101
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.004
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/33401

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us