Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Nonverbal conjunction errors in recognition memory: Support for familiarity but not for feature bundling

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (2006) Nonverbal conjunction errors in recognition memory: Support for familiarity but not for feature bundling. In: 6tth Meeting of the Society-for-Applied-Research-Into-Memory-and-Cognition, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND, JAN, 2005. Published in: JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 55 (1). pp. 138-155.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.002

Abstract

Conjunction errors occur when participants incorrectly identify as "old" novel test stimuli created by recombining parts of two study stimuli (parent items). Prior studies have reported that the conjunction error rate is higher when parent items are studied together than when they are studied apart (a parent proximity effect). In several experiments we attempted to obtain parent proximity effects with naturalistic faces or pairs of symbol strings. We also varied the type of facial conjunction (Experiments 1, 3A-3C), the presentation rate during study (Experiment 5), and the study list length across experiments (long lists in Experiments 1, 3A, 3B.. and 3C; short lists in Experiments 2, 4, and 5). Conjunction effects, but not parent proximity effects, occurred in each experiment. The results are consistent with familiarity-based explanations of the conjunction effect but fail to support a feature bundling hypothesis. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Conference Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Subjects: P Language and Literature
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Journal or Publication Title: JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
Publisher: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
ISSN: 0749-596X
Date: July 2006
Volume: 55
Number: 1
Number of Pages: 18
Page Range: pp. 138-155
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.002
Publication Status: Published
Title of Event: 6tth Meeting of the Society-for-Applied-Research-Into-Memory-and-Cognition
Location of Event: Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Date(s) of Event: JAN, 2005
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/33402

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us