Women and children first? Potential gender bias in a legal text in the UK
Wharton, Sue. (2009) Women and children first? Potential gender bias in a legal text in the UK. Women and Language, Vol.32 (No.1). pp. 99-102. ISSN 8755-4550
Official URL: http://www.womenandlanguage.org/OJS/index.php?jour...
This paper explores a perceived social problem in the UK from a critical discourse analysis perspective. The problem is that of divorced fathers’ lack of access to a family relationship with their children. To explore it, I examine one of the legal forms used to determine child residence after divorce. I first analyse the ways in which this text represents mothers’ and fathers’ relationships with their children. I then go on to analyse the form as part of a legal exchange between individuals and official bureaucracy. I conclude not only that the form fails to facilitate equal legal rights for all parties concerned, but also that it fails to serve children’s best interests due to its perpetration of gender stereotypes.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
K Law > KD England and Wales
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Law -- Language, Divorce -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain, Critical discourse analysis -- Great Britain, Stereotypes (Social psychology), Parent and child -- Great Britain|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Women and Language|
|Publisher:||George Mason University|
|Number of Pages:||4|
|Page Range:||pp. 99-102|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Albertson Fineman, Martha (2001). ‘Fatherhood, feminism and family law’. McGeorge Law Review 32: 1031-1049. Barker, Christopher, & Dariusz Galaskinski (2001). Cultural studies and discourse analysis: a dialogue on language and identity. London: Sage Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in later modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Collier, Richard (2005). Fathers 4 Justice, law and the new politics of fatherhood. Child and Family Law Quarterly 17 (4): 511-534. Court Service Leaflet D183. About Divorce. www.courtservice.gov.uk Court Service Leaflet D184.I want a divorce: what do I do? www.courtservice.gov.uk Fairclough, Norman (1996). The technologisation of discourse. In Carmen Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices: readings in critical discourse analysis ,71-83. London: Routledge. Fairclough, Norman (1999). Language and power. (2nd ed.). London: Longman. Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. Gee, James (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses. ( 2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis. Kanagas, Felicity & Day Sclater, Shelley (2004). Contact disputes: Narrative constructions of ‘good’ parents. Feminist Legal Studies 12(1): 1-27. Office of National Statistics: www.statistics.gov.uk Sarangi, Srikant & Stefan Slembrouck (1996). Language, bureaucracy and social control. Harlow: Longman. Talbot, Mary, Atkinson, Karen, & David Atkinson (2003). Language and power in the modern world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Van Dijk, Teun (1996) ‘Discourse, Power and Access’ In Carmen Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coutlhard (eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 84-106. London: Routledge. Van Leeuwen, Theo (1996) ’The Representation of Social Actors’. In Carmen Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coutlhard (eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 32-70. London: Routledge. Wharton, Sue (2006). Divide and rule: the power of adversarial subjectivities in the discourse of divorce. Text and Talk 26 (6): 791-814. Young, L. & Harrison, C. (eds) Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. London: Continuum.|
Actions (login required)