Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Trade costs, 1870–2000

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Jacks, David S. (David Steven), Meissner, Christopher M. (Christopher Michael) and Novy, Dennis. (2008) Trade costs, 1870–2000. American Economic Review, Vol.98 (No.2). pp. 529-534. ISSN 0002-8282

[img] PDF
WRAP_Novy_tcaea.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (631Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.529

Abstract

What has driven trade booms and trade busts in the past century and a half? Was it changes in global output or in the costs of international trade? To address this question, we derive a micro-founded measure of aggregate bilateral trade costs based on a standard model of trade in differentiated goods. These trade costs gauge the difference between observed bilateral trade and frictionless trade in terms of an implied markup on retail prices of foreign goods. Thus, we are able to estimate the combined magnitude of tariffs, transportation costs, and all other macroeconomic frictions that impede international trade but that are inherently difficult to observe. We use this measure to examine the growth of global trade between 1870 and 1913, its retreat from 1921 to 1939, and its subsequent rise from 1950 to 2000. We find that trade cost declines explain roughly 55 percent of the pre–World War I trade boom and 33 percent of the post–World War II trade boom, while a precipitous rise in trade costs explains the entire interwar trade bust.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Globalization -- Economic aspects, International trade -- Econometric models, International trade -- Research, International economic relations -- History -- 19th century, International economic relations -- History -- 20th century
Journal or Publication Title: American Economic Review
Publisher: American Economic Association
ISSN: 0002-8282
Date: May 2008
Volume: Vol.98
Number: No.2
Page Range: pp. 529-534
Identification Number: 10.1257/aer.98.2.529
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
References: Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review, 93(1): 170–92. Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop. 2004. “Trade Costs.” Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3): 691–751. Baier, Scott L., and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. 2001. “The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs, and Income Similarity.” Journal of International Economics, 53(1): 1–27. Clemens, Michael A., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 2001. “A Tariff-Growth Paradox? Protection’s Impact the World around 1875–1997.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8459. Eichengreen, Barry, and Douglas A. Irwin. 1995. “Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs and the Reorientation of World Trade in the 1930s.” Journal of International Economics, 38(1–2): 1–24. Estevadeordal, Antoni, Brian Frantz, and Alan M. Taylor. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870–1939.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2): 359–407. Hummels, David. 2007. “Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3): 131–54. Irwin, Douglas A. 1995. “The GATT in Historical Perspective.” American Economic Review, 85(2): 323–28. Jacks, David S., Christopher M. Meissner, and Dennis Novy. 2006. “Trade Costs in the First Wave of Globalization.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12602. Jacks, David S., and Krishna Pendakur. 2007. “Global Trade and the Maritime Transport Revolution.” http://www.sfu.ca/~djacks/papers/ workingpapers/transport.pdf. López-Córdova, J. Ernesto, and Christopher M. Meissner. 2003. “Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era.” American Economic Review, 93(1): 344–53. Novy, Dennis. 2007. “Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs with Panel Data.” http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/ staff/faculty/novy/fast.pdf. Obstfeld, Maurice, and Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2001. “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, ed. Ben S. Bernanke, and Kenneth S. Rogoff, 339–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Rose, Andrew K. 2000. “One Money, One Market: The Effect of Common Currencies on Trade.” Economic Policy, 15(30): 7–46. Shah Mohammed, Saif I., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 2004. “Freight Rates and Productivity Gains in British Tramp Shipping 1869–1950.” Explorations in Economic History, 41(2): 172–203. Whalley, John, and Xian Xin. 2007. “Regionalization, Changes in Home Bias, and the Growth of World Trade.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13023.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3378

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us