Owen, Aneirin Sion (2010) The political economy of the accounting firm. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

PDF WRAP_THESIS_Owen_2010.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (820Kb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The aim of this thesis is the development of a political economy of large accounting and
auditing firms. The importance of this lies in the rapid growth of these firms and the lack
of appropriate theories. Economists have applied the theory of the firm to accounting and
have approached auditing from agency and litigation costs perspectives, while
sociologists have studied the culture of accounting firms and approached auditing using
concepts such as ‘legitimation’ and ‘jurisdiction’. These approaches do not recognise
that to do justice to the subject matter, we must study accounting firms in the broader
context of accounting and its many conceptual and practical problems. These include the
conceptual framework, auditor independence, the audit expectations gap, creative
accounting, and fraud. To study the accounting firm within the context of accounting the
thesis develops a political economy approach that emphasises conflict between investors,
managers, workers, and the state. This approach proves helpful because it encompasses
all accounting and auditing problems within a framework that recognises agency and
links together the profits of accounting firms with their legitimation.
The method adopted is the development of a theory of the profits of accounting firms and
a model of factors driving auditor independence. Following Bryer, the thesis develops
the theory from Marx’s Capital by combining his analyses of ‘bookkeeping’ and
‘commercial capital’. The theory highlights that as capitalist enterprises accounting firms
compete with all other capitalist firms for a share of surplus value, as well as competing
with other accounting firms. However, the political economy approach also highlights
the essential contradiction in accounting: that measuring and disclosing profits can
exacerbate the ‘labour danger’. The provocative character of accounting means that
disguise of profits is part of its nature, but that this must co-exist with the contradictory
need for accurate, objective measurement of profits. The model therefore suggests that
the role accounting firms play in disguise is the key to understanding their behaviour. It
predicts that as the level of profits and labour militancy rises, so do investors’ demand for
disguise. However, because investors need disguise, auditors cannot have full
independence, and the thesis concludes that this explains why auditing is within the
private sector. Its general conclusion is that rather than being a principle, auditor
independence is a variable driven by investors’ needs and the capitalist tactics of
accounting firms.
The thesis derives and tests two behavioural predictions. First, that accounting firms will
exhibit the same types of behaviour as other capitalist firms. Second, the auditor does not
act independently. The thesis tests these predictions with evidence of accounting firms’
mergers and profit margins (1986 to 1995), the changes introduced in the US to increase
auditor independence (2001 to 2003), and the change to limited liability partnership
status (2004 to 2007) in the UK. The high levels of profits disclosed by the LLP
accounting firms and the close relationship between mergers and profit margins support
the hypothesis that accounting firms adopt capitalist tactics. The wide-ranging debates
(1995 to 2005) and changes to auditor independence rules introduced by SEC and
Sarbanes-Oxley support the hypothesis that claims of auditor independence are untrue,
and that the level of audit independence is a variable. The thesis proposes further
development of the theory through historical research and formalising the model.

Item Type:	Thesis (PhD)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HG Finance H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Accounting firms, Auditing, Accounting -- Economic aspects
Official Date:	March 2010
Dates:	Date Event March 2010 Submitted
Institution:	University of Warwick
Theses Department:	Warwick Business School
Thesis Type:	PhD
Publication Status:	Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor:	Bryer, R. A.
Extent:	328 leaves
Language:	English

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads