Are people willing to pay to reduce others' incomes?
Oswald, Andrew J. and Zizzo, Daniel J. (2000) Are people willing to pay to reduce others' incomes? Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. Warwick economic research papers (No.568).
WRAP_Oswald_finaljuly13paris.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
This paper studies utility interdependence in the laboratory. We design an experiment where subjects can reduce ("burn") other subjects' money. Those who burn the money of others have to give up some of their own cash. Despite this cost, and contrary to the assumptions of economics textbooks, the majority of our subjects choose to destroy at least part of others' money holdings. We vary experimentally the amount that subjects have to pay to reduce other people's cash. The implied price elasticity of burning is calculated; it is mostly less than unity. There is a strong correlation between wealth, or rank, and the amounts by which subjects are burnt. In making their decisions, many burners, especially disadvantaged
ones, seem to care about whether another person ‘deserves’ the money he has. Desert is not simply a matter of relative payoff.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Decision making, Consumer behavior|
|Series Name:||Warwick economic research papers|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick, Department of Economics|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||38|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
Agell, J. (1999), On the Benefits from Rigid Labour Markets: Norms, Market Failures, and
Actions (login required)