Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Anisotropic diffusion limited aggregation in three dimensions : universality and nonuniversality

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Goold, Nicholas R., Somfai, Ellák and Ball, R. C.. (2005) Anisotropic diffusion limited aggregation in three dimensions : universality and nonuniversality. Physical Review E, Vol.72 (No.3). ISSN 1539-3755

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Ball_Anisotropic_diffusion_limited.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (640Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031403

Abstract

We explore the macroscopic consequences of lattice anisotropy for diffusion limited aggregation (DLA) in three dimensions. Simple cubic and bcc lattice growths are shown to approach universal asymptotic states in a coherent fashion, and the approach is accelerated by the use of noise reduction. These states are strikingly anisotropic dendrites with a rich hierarchy of structure. For growth on an fcc lattice, our data suggest at least two stable fixed points of anisotropy, one matching the bcc case. Hexagonal growths, favoring six planar and two polar directions, appear to approach a line of asymptotic states with continuously tunable polar anisotropy. The more planar of these growths visually resembles real snowflake morphologies. Our simulations use a new and dimension-independent implementation of the DLA model. The algorithm maintains a hierarchy of sphere coverings of the growth, supporting efficient random walks onto the growth by spherical moves. Anisotropy was introduced by restricting growth to certain preferred directions.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QD Chemistry
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Aggregation (Chemistry) -- Mathematical models, Anisotropy, Diffusion
Journal or Publication Title: Physical Review E
Publisher: American Physical Society
ISSN: 1539-3755
Date: September 2005
Volume: Vol.72
Number: No.3
Number of Pages: 10
Identification Number: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031403
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: European Commission (EC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)
Grant number: HPMF-CT-2000-00800 (EC)
References: [1] T. A. Witten and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981). [2] M. Plischke and Z. R´acz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 415 (1984). [3] A. Coniglio and M. Zannetti, Physica A 163, 325 (1990). [4] E. Somfai, L. M. Sander, and R. C. Ball, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5523 (1999). [5] C. Amitrano, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6618 (1989). [6] M. H. Jensen, J. Mathiesen, and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. E 67, 042402 (2003). [7] E. Somfai, N. R. Goold, R. C. Ball, J. P. Devita, and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. E 70, 051403 (2004). [8] J. S. Langer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 1 (1980). [9] W. W. Mullins and R. F. Sekerka, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 323 (1963). [10] J. Nittmann, G. Daccord, and H. E. Stanley, Nature 314, 141 (1985). [11] M. Matsushita, M. Sano, Y. Hayakawa, H. Honjo, and Y. Sawada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 286 (1984). [12] R. M. Brady and R. C. Ball, Nature 309, 225 (1984). [13] L. Niemeyer, L. Pietronero, and H. J. Wiesmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1033 (1984). [14] J. Nittman and H. E. Stanley, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, L1185 (1987). [15] R. C. Ball and E. Somfai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135503 (2002). [16] R. C. Ball and E. Somfai, Phys. Rev. E 67, 021401 (2003). [17] K. G. Libbrecht and V. M. Tanusheva, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3253 (1999). [18] S. C. Huang and M. E. Glicksman, Acta. Metall. 29, 717 (1981). [19] D. P. Corrigan, M. B. Koss, J. C. LaCombe, K. D. de Jager, L. A. Tennenhouse, andM. E. Glicksman, Phys. Rev. E 60, 7217 (1999). [20] W. B. Russel, P. M. Chaikin, J. Zhu, M. V. Meyer, and R. Rogers, Langmuir 13, 3871 (1997). [21] J. Zhu, M. Li, R. Rogers, W. Meyer, R. H. Ottewill, W. B. Russel, and P. M. Chaikin, Nature 387, 883 (1997). [22] M. E. Glicksman and S. P. Marsh, in Handbook of Crystal Growth, edited by D. T. J. Hurle (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993), p. 1077. [23] R. Kobayashi, Physica D 63, 410 (1993). [24] W. L. George and J. A. Warren, J. Comp. Phys. 177, 264 (2002). [25] P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 36, 332 (1987). [26] R. C. Ball, R. M. Brady, G. Rossi, and B. R. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1406 (1985). [27] R. C. Ball and R. M. Brady, J. Phys. A 18, L809 (1985). [28] S. Tolman and P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 40, 428 (1989). [29] N. E. Bowler and R. C. Ball (2004), cond-mat/0404650. [30] R. C. Ball, N. E. Bowler, L. M. Sander, and E. Somfai, Phys. Rev. E 66, 026109 (2002). [31] P. W. Barker and R. C. Ball, Phys. Rev. A 42, R6289 (1990).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/34485

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us