Tear down this wall : on the persistence of borders in trade
Nitsch, Volker and Wolf, Nikolaus, 1973- (2009) Tear down this wall : on the persistence of borders in trade. Working Paper. Economics Department University of Warwick: University of Warwick. (The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS)).
WRAP_Nitsch_twerp_919.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
Why do borders still matter for economic activity? The reunification of Germany in 1990 provides a unique natural experiment for examining the effect of political borders on trade both in the cross-section and over time. With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the rapid formation of a political and economic union, strong and strictly enforced administrative barriers to trade between East Germany and West Germany were eliminated completely within a very short period of time. The evolution of intra-German trade flows after reunification then provides new insights for both the globalization and border effects literatures. Our estimation results show a remarkable persistence in intra-German trade patterns along the former East-West border; political integration is not rapidly followed by economic integration. Instead, we estimate that it takes at least one generation (between 33 and 40 years or more) to remove the impact of political borders on trade. This finding strongly suggests that border effects are neither statistical artefacts nor mainly driven by administrative or “red tape” barriers to trade, but arise from economic fundamentals.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Berlin Wall, Berlin, Germany, 1961-1989 -- Economic aspects, Germany -- Economic conditions -- 20th century, Boundaries -- Economic aspects, International trade|
|Series Name:||The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick|
|Place of Publication:||Economics Department University of Warwick|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Anderson, James E. and Eric van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle,” American Economic Review. 93 (March): 170-192. Anderson, James E. and Eric van Wincoop. 2004. “Trade Costs,” Journal of Economic Literature. 42 (September): 691-751. Chen, Natalie. 2004. “Intra-National versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter?” Journal of International Economics. 63 (May): 93-118. Combes Pierre-Philippe, Miren Lafourcade and Thierry Mayer. 2005. “The Trade-Creating Effects of Business and Social Networks: Evidence from France,” Journal of International Economics. 66 (May): 1-29. Eckey, Hans-Friedrich and Klaus Horn. 2000. “Die Angleichung der Verkehrsinfrastruktur im vereinigten Deutschland zwischen 1990 und 1999,” Raumforschung und Raumordnung. 58 (5): 373-381. Fuchs-Schündeln, Nicola and Matthias Schündeln. 2009. “Who Stays, Who Goes, Who Returns?” Economics of Transition. 17 (October): 703-738. Head, Keith and Thierry Mayer. 2002. “Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurement Inflates Estimates of Home Bias in Trade,” CEPII Working paper 02-01. Hillberry, Russell and David Hummels. 2008. “Trade Responses to Geographic Frictions: A Decomposition Using Micro-Data,” European Economic Review. 52 (April): 527-550. Mann, Hans-Ulrich, Reinhard Mück, Markus Schubert, Heinz Hautzinger and Ralf Hamacher. 1991. Personenverkehrsprognose 2010 für Deutschland. München and Heilbronn. McCallum, John. 1995. “National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns,” American Economic Review. 85 (June): 615-623. Nitsch, Volker. 2000. “National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union”, Canadian Journal of Economics. 33 (November): 1091-1105. Nitsch, Volker. 2004. “Border Effects and Border Regions: Lessons from the German Unification,” Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft. 24 (1): 23-38. Nitsch, Volker and Nikolaus Wolf. 2009. “Trade Liberalization and Trade Expansion: Evidence from the German Reunification,“ Darmstadt and Warwick. Rauch, James E. 1999. “Networks versus Markets in International Trade,” Journal of International Economics. 48 (June): 7-35. Reim, Uwe. 2007. “Kombinierter Verkehr 2005: Wachstum der Containertransporte in allen Verkehrsbereichen,” Wirtschaft und Statistik. (February): 169-179. Schulze, Max-Stephan and Nikolaus Wolf. 2009. “On the Origins of Border Effects: Evidence from the Habsburg Empire,” Journal of Economic Geography. 9 (January): 117-136. Santos Silva, Joao M.C. and Silvana Tenreyro. 2006. “The Log of Gravity,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 88 (November): 641-658. Statistisches Bundesamt. 2005. Kombinierter Verkehr 2003. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. Redding, Stephen J. and Daniel M. Sturm. 2008. “The Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification,” American Economic Review. 98 (December): 1766-1797. Wolf, Nikolaus. 2009. “Was Germany Ever United? Evidence from Intra- and International Trade, 1885-1993,” Journal of Economic History. 69 (September): 846-881.|
Actions (login required)