Napier, Fiona, Davies, Robin P., Baldock, Catherine, Stevens, Harry, Lockey, Andrew S., Bullock, Ian and Perkins, Gavin D. (2009) Validation for a scoring system of the ALS cardiac arrest simulation test (CASTest). Resuscitation, Vol.80 (No.9). pp. 1034-1038. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.043

Preview

PDF WRAP_Perkins_1070268-lb-190511-perkins_castest-test-performance-v-resubmission-v1-16-3-09.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (190Kb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Aim: The Cardiac Arrest Simulation Test (CASTest) assesses resuscitation knowledge and skills during a simulated cardiac arrest. The aim of this study is to validate an alternative scoring system for measuring individual candidate performance during research involving the CASTest.

Methods: The performance of 537 participants was measured using the new scoring system. In addition, assessors assigned a global pass-fail decision. Differences in scores were compared between to global pass/ fail decisions, professional groups and those nominated to become instructors. Correlations between CASTest domain scores and overall score, multiple choice scores and other practical tests (airway test and initial assessment and resuscitation test) scores were measured. This provided opportunity to cross reference achievement in other areas of course assessment with this alternative scoring system.

Results: 413 (76.9%) passed the CASTest and 124 (23.1%) failed. The total performance score was significantly higher in those that passed than in those that failed (median 77 vs 62.5, P<0.0001). There were no differences between professions. Senior staff performed slightly better than junior staff (median 74 and 72 respectively, P=0.01). Excellent participants (identified as having instructor potential) scored significantly higher than the other participants (median 94 and 72 respectively, P <0.0001). A strong correlation was demonstrated between domains in the CASTest (rho 0.72-0.82, P<0.01). Other assessment outcomes for the ALS course correlated poorly with CASTest scores (rho = 0.27-0.37, P<0.01).

Conclusion: This new simple scoring system can be used to better characterise performance on the ALS course CASTest than the current binary pass-fail outcome.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	CPR (First aid) -- Study and teaching, CPR (First aid) -- Methodology, Hospitals -- Medical staff -- Rating of
Journal or Publication Title:	Resuscitation
Publisher:	Elsevier Ireland Ltd
ISSN:	1873-1570
Official Date:	September 2009
Dates:	Date Event September 2009 Published
Date of first compliant deposit:	16 December 2015
Volume:	Vol.80
Number:	No.9
Page Range:	pp. 1034-1038
DOI:	10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.043
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR), Resuscitation Council (UK), Laerdal Medical Corporation

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads