Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Modelling health scores with the skew-normal distribution

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hutton, Jane L. and Stanghellini, E. (2009) Modelling health scores with the skew-normal distribution. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for Research in Statistical Methodology, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Hutton_09-39w.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (695Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/statistics/crism...

Abstract

Health care interventions which use quality of life or health scores often provide data which are skewed and bounded. The scores are typically formed by adding up responses to a number of questions. Different questions might have different weights, but the scores will be bounded, and are often scaled to the range 0 to 100. If improvement in health over time is measured, scores will tend to cluster near the 'healthy' or 'good' boundary as time progresses, leading to a skew distribution. Further, some patients will drop out as time progresses, so the scores reflect a selected population. We fit models based on the skew-normal distribution to data from a randomised controlled trial of treatments for sprained ankles, in which scores were recorded at baseline and 1, 3 and 9 months. We consider the extent to which skewness in the data can be explained by the clustering at the boundary via a comparison between a censored normal and a censored skew-normal model. As this analysis is based on the complete data only, a formula for the distortion of the treatment effects due to informative drop-out is given. This allows us to assess under which conditions the conclusions drawn on the complete data may be either reinforced or reversed, when the informative drop-out process is taken into account.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Medical care -- Statistics
Series Name: Working papers
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for Research in Statistical Methodology
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 2009
Volume: Vol.2009
Number: No.39
Number of Pages: 13
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Great Britain. Dept. of Health (DoH), University of Warwick. Centre for Research in Statistical Methodology, Italy. Ministero dell'istruzione, dell'università e della ricerca (MIUR)
Grant number: 01/14/10 (DoH), PRIN 2007XECZ7L−003 (MIUR)
References: [1] Azzalini A, Capitanio A. Statistical application of the multivariate skew-normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1999; 61,3,579-602. [2] Skinner, CJ. Discussion on ”Informative drop-out in longitudinal data analysis” by PJ Diggle and MG Kenward. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 1994; 43, 76-77. [3] Lamb SE, Marsh JL, Hutton JL, Nakash RA, Cooke MW. Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprains: a pragmatic, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2009; 373, 575–581. [4] Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J. Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial - a qualitative study of the patient’s perspective. BMC Med Res Meth. 2008; 14, 226-235. [5] Wetherill GB. Intermediate statistical methods. London: Chapman and Hall, 1981. [6] Heckman JJ. Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 1979; 47, 153–61. [7] Copas, JB, Li HG. Inference for Non-random Samples (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1997; 59, 55-95. [8] Wooldridge JM. Econometrics Analysis of Cross Section and Panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003. [9] Marchetti GM, Stanghellini E. A note on distortions induced by truncation, with application to linear regression systems. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2008; 78, 824–829. [10] Diggle, PJ, Kenward MG. Informative drop-out in longitudinal data analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 1994; 43, 49-93. [11] Goldberger AS. Linear regression after selection. Journal of Econometrics, 1981; 15, 357– 66.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35226

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us