The Library
On the theory of a firm : the case of by-production of emissions
Tools
Murty, Sushama (2010) On the theory of a firm : the case of by-production of emissions. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics, Coventry.
|
PDF
WRAP_Murty_twerp_934.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (431Kb) |
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
Abstract
Five attributes of emission generating technologies are identified and a concept of byproduction is introduced, which implies these five attributes. Murty and Russell [2010] characterization of technologies, which requires distinguishing between intended production of firms and nature's laws of emission generation, is shown to be both necessary and sufficient for by-production. While intended production could be postulated to satisfy standard input and output free-disposability, these will necessarily be violated by nature's emission generation mechanism, which satisfies costly disposability of emission as defined in Murty [2010]. Marginal technical and economic costs of abatement are derived for technologies exhibiting by-production. A simple model of by-production illustrates that, while common abatement paths considered in the literature do involve a technological trade off between emission reduction and intended production, there also almost always exist abatement paths where it is possible to have both greater emission reductions and greater intended outputs. Further, marginal abatement costs will usually be decreasing in the initial level of emissions of firms. Counterintuitive as these results may sound in the first instance, they are intuitively obvious in the by-production approach as it is rich enough to incorporate both standard economic assumptions with respect to intended production of firms and the rules of nature that govern emission generation.
| Item Type: | Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Industries -- By-products, Industries -- Environmental aspects, Input-output analysis, Environmental economics |
| Series Name: | Warwick economics research paper series (TWERPS) |
| Publisher: | University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics |
| Place of Publication: | Coventry |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Volume: | Vol.2010 |
| Number: | No.934 |
| Status: | Not Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| References: | Baumol, W. J., and W. E. Oates [1988], The Theory of Environmental Policy, Second Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cropper, M. L., and W. E. Oates [1992], “Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature 30: 675-740. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell, and C. Pasurka [1989], “Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics 71: 90-98. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell, and S. Yaisawarng [1993], “Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 374-380. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, D. W. Noh, and W. Weber [2005], “Characteristics of a Polluting Technology: Theory and Practice," Journal of Econometrics 126: 469-492. R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, and C. Pasurka [1986], “Eects of Relative Eciency in Electric Power Generation Due to Environmental Controls," Resources and Energy 8: 167-184. Frsund, F. [2009], “Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 3: 1- 38. Frisch, R. [1965], Theory of Production, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Milleron, J. C. [1972], “Theory of Value with Public Goods," Journal of Economic Theory 5: 419-477. Murty, M. N., and S. Kumar [2002], “Measuring Cost of Environmentally Sustainable Industrial Development in India: A Distance Function Approach," Environment and Development Economics 7: 467-86. Murty, M. N., and S. Kumar [2003], “Win-Win Opportunities and Environmental Regulation: Testing of Porter Hypothesis for Indian Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Environmental Management 67: 139-44. Murty, S. [2010], “Externalities and Fundamental Nonconvexities: A Reconciliation of Approaches to General Equilibrium Externality Modeling and Implications for Decentralization," Journal of Economic Theory 145: 331-53. Murty, S., and R. R. Russell [2010], “On Modeling Pollution-Generating Technologies," The Warwick Economics Research Papers Series (TWERPS), No. 931. Shephard, R. W. [1953], Cost and Production Functions, Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3525 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

