Nash implementation with partially honest individuals
Dutta, Bhaskar and Sen, Arunava (2009) Nash implementation with partially honest individuals. Working Paper. Department of Economics, University of Warwick: University of Warwick. (The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), Vol.2009).
WRAP_Dutta_twerp_920.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
We investigate the problem of Nash implementation in the presence of "partially honest" individuals. A partially honest player is one who has a strict preference for revealing the true state over lying when truthtelling does not lead to a worse outcome (according to preferences in the true state) than that which obtains when lying. We show that when there are at least three individuals, the presence of even a single partially honest individual (whose identity is not known to the planner) can lead to a dramatic increase in the class of Nash implementable social choice correspondences. In particular, all social choice correspondences satisfying No Veto Power can be implemented. We also provide necessary and sufficient conditions for implementation in the two-person case when there is exactly one partially honest individual and when both individuals are partially honest. We describe some implications of the characterization conditions for the two-person case. Finally, we extend our three or more individual result to the case where there is an individual with an arbitrary small but strictly positive probability of being partially honest.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Q Science > QA Mathematics
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Game theory|
|Series Name:||The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick|
|Place of Publication:||Department of Economics, University of Warwick|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:|| Abreu, D. and A. Sen (1991), "Virtual Implementation in Nash Equilib- rium", Econometrica, 59, 997-1021.  Abdou, J. and H. Keiding (1991), Effectivity Functions in Social Choice, Kluwer Academic Publishers.  Busetto, F. and G. Codognato. (2009), "Reconsidering Two-agent Nash Implementation", Social Choice and Welfare, 22, 171-179.  Dutta, B. and A. Sen (1991), "A Necessary and Su±cient Condition for Two-Person Nash Implemention", Review of Economic Studies, 58, 121- 128.  Fehr, E. and K.Schmidt (1999),"A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.  Fehr, E., U. Fischbacher and S.Gachter (2002), "Strong Reciprocity, Hu- man Cooperation and the enforcement of Social Norms", Human Nature, 13, 1-25.  Hurwicz, L. and D. Schmeidler (1978), "Outcome Functions that Guarantee the Existence and Pareto Optimality of Nash Equilibria", Economterica, 46, 144-174.  Jackson, M.O. (2001), "A Crash Course in Implementation Theory", Social Choice and Welfare, 18, 655-708.  Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch and R.Thaler," Fairness as a Constraint on Prot-seeking: Entitlements in the Market", American Economic Review, 76,728-741.  Maskin, E. (1999), "Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality", Review of Economic Studies, 66, 23-38.  Maskin, E. and T. Sjostrom (2002), "Implementation Theory", in Hand- book of Social Choice Theory, Vol.1, edited by K.J. Arrow, A.K. Sen and K.Suzumura, North Holland.  Matsushima, H. (2008a), "Role of Honesty in Full Implementation", Jour- nal of Economic Theory, 139, 353-359.  Matsushima, H. (2008b), "Behavioral Aspects of Implementation Theory", Economic Letters, 100, 161-164.  Moore, J. and R. Repullo (1990), "Nash Implementation: A Full Charac- terization", Economterica, 58, 1083-1099.  Moulin, H. (1983), The Strategy of Social Choice, Advanced Texbooks in Economics, Editors: C.J. Bliss and M.D. Intrilligator, North-Holland, Am- sterdam.  Rabin, M. (1993), "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Eco- nomics", American Economic Review, 83, 1281-1320.  Roth, A. (1995)," Bargaining Experiments" in J.Kagel and A.Roth (edited) Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press.|
Actions (login required)