The Library

A new general glucose homeostatic model using a proportional-integral-derivative controller

Tools

Watson, E. M., Chappell, M. J. (Michael J.), Ducrozet, F., Poucher, S. M. and Yates, J. W. T.. (2011) A new general glucose homeostatic model using a proportional-integral-derivative controller. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol.102 (No.2). pp. 119-129. ISSN 0169-2607

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Chappell_0873262-es-060312-report.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (625Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.08.013

Abstract

The glucose-insulin system is a challenging process to model due to the feedback mechanisms present, hence the implementation of a model-based approach to the system is an on-going and challenging research area. A new approach is proposed here which provides an effective way of characterising glycaemic regulation. The resulting model is built on the premise that there are three phases of insulin secretion, similar to those seen in a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) type controller used in engineering control problems. The model relates these three phases to a biological understanding of the system, as well as the logical premise that the homeostatic mechanisms will maintain very tight control of the system. It includes states for insulin, glucose, insulin action and a state to simulate an integral function of glucose. Structural identifiability analysis was performed on the model to determine whether a unique set of parameter values could be identified from the available observations, which should permit meaningful conclusions to be drawn from parameter estimation. Although two parameters - glucose production rate and the proportional control coefficient - were found to be unidentifiable, the former is not a concern as this is known to be impossible to measure without a tracer experiment, and the latter can be easily estimated from other means. Subsequent parameter estimation using Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test (IVGTT) and hyperglycaemic clamp data was performed and subsequent model simulations have shown good agreement with respect to these real data.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

Q Science > QP Physiology

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Engineering

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Insulin -- Synthesis -- Regulation -- Mathematical models

Journal or Publication Title:

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Publisher:

Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

ISSN:

0169-2607

Official Date:

May 2011

Dates:

Date	Event
May 2011	Published

Volume:

Vol.102

Number:

No.2

Page Range:

pp. 119-129

Identification Number:

10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.08.013

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Restricted or Subscription Access

Funder:

AstraZeneca (Firm)

References:

[1] R. Bergman, Y. Ider, C. Bowden, C. Cobelli, Quantitative estimation of
insulin sensitivity, Am.J.Physiol. 236 (6) (1979) E667{E677.
[2] A. De Gaetano, O. Arino, Mathematical modelling of the intravenous glu-
cose tolerance test, J.Math.Biol. 40 (2) (2000) 136{168.
[3] B. Topp, K. Promislow, G. deVries, R. Miura, D. Finegood, A model
of beta-cell mass, insulin, and glucose kinetics: pathways to diabetes,
J.Theor.Biol. 206 (4) (2000) 605{619.
[4] H. E. Silber, P. M. Jauslin, N. Frey, R. Gieschke, U. S. Simonsson, M. O.
Karlsson, An integrated model for glucose and insulin regulation in healthy
volunteers and type 2 diabetic patients following intravenous glucose provo-
cations, J Clin Pharmacol 47 (9) (2007) 1159{1171.
[5] S. Haffner, Type 2 diabetes: Unravelling its causes and consequences: A
compendium of classical papers, Cambridge: Medical Publications, (2002).
[6] V. W. Bolie, Coefficients of normal blood glucose regulation,
J.Appl.Physiol. 16 (5) (1961) 783{788.
[7] B. Kasiske, M. O'Donnell, W. Keane, The zucker rat model of obesity,
insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and renal injury, Hypertension 19 (1
Suppl) (1992) I110{I115.
[8] M. Vester, R. Van der Linden, J. Pangels, Control design for an industrial
distillation column, Computers & Chemical Engineering 17 (5-6) (1993)
609{615.
[9] C. Bissell, Control Engineering, Vol. 2nd Revised edition, CRC Press,
(1994).
[10] G. M. Steil, A. E. Panteleon, K. Rebrin, Closed-loop insulin delivery-the
path to physiological glucose control, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56 (2004) 125{
44.
[11] G. M. Steil, B. Clark, S. Kanderian, K. Rebrin, Modeling insulin action for
development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas, Diabetes Technol Ther 7
(2005) 94{108.
[12] C. V. Doran, N. H. Hudson, K. T. Moorhead, J. G. Chase, G. M. Shaw,
C. E. Hann, Derivative weighted active insulin control modelling and clin-
ical trials for ICU patients, Med Eng Phys 26 (2005) 94{108.
[13] G. Marchetti, M. Barolo, L. Jovanic, H. Zisser, D. E. Seborg, An improved
PID switching control strategy for type 1 diabetes, IEEE Trans Biomed
Eng 55 (2004) 857{65.
[14] K. A. Wintergerst, D. Deiss, B. Buckingham, M. Cantwell, S. Kache,
S. Agarwal, D. M. Wilson, G. Steil, Glucose control in pediatric inten-
sive care unit pateints using an insulin-glucose algorithm, Diabetes Technol
Ther 9 (2008) 211{22.
[15] G. Steil, K. Rebrin, J. J. Mastrototaro, Metabolic modelling and the closed-
loop insulin delivery problem, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
74 (Supplement 2) (2006) S183{S186.
[16] D. Langin, Diabetes, insulin secretion, and the pancreatic beta-cell mito-
chondrion, N.Engl.J.Med. 345 (24) (2001) 1772{1774.
[17] T. Bratanova-Tochkova, H. Cheng, S. Daniel, S. Gunawardana, Y. Liu,
J. Mulvaney-Musa, T. Schermerhorn, S. Straub, H. Yajima, G. Sharp, Trig-
gering and augmentation mechanisms, granule pools, and biphasic insulin
secretion, Diabetes 51 Suppl 1 (2002) S83{S90.
[18] E. R. Carson, C. Cobelli, Modelling methodology for physiology and
medicine, San Diego, Calif. ; Academic, c2001.
[19] A. Natali, A. Gastaldelli, S. Camastra, A. M. Sironi, E. Toschi, A. Masoni,
E. Ferrannini, A. Mari, Dose-response characteristics of insulin action on
glucose metabolism: a non-steady-state approach, Am J Physiol Endocrinol
Metab 278 (2000) 794{801.
[20] R. L. Prigeon, M. E. Roder, J. Porte, D., S. E. Kahn, The effect of insulin
dose on the measurement of insulin sensitivity by the minimal model tech-
nique. Evidence for saturable insulin transport in humans, J Clin Invest 97
(1996) 501{7.
[21] M. Muller, U. Paschen, H. Seitz, Glucose production measured by tracer
and balance data in conscious miniature pig, Am J Physiol Endocrinol
Metab 244 (3) (1983) E236{E244.
[22] J. J. Lima, N. Matsushima, N. Kissoon, J. Wang, J. E. Sylvester, W. J.
Jusko, Modeling the metabolic effects of terbutaline in [beta]2-adrenergic
receptor diplotypes[ast], Clin Pharmacol Ther 76 (1) (2004) 27{37.
[23] M. J. Chappell, K. Godfrey, S. Vajda, Global identifiability of the param-
eters of nonlinear systems with specified inputs: a comparison of methods,
Math.Biosci. 102 (1) (1990) 41{73.
[24] J. W. Yates, N. D. Evans, M. J. Chappell, Structural identifiability analysis
via symmetries of differential equations, Automatica 45 (11) (2009) 2585 {
2591. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.07.009.
[25] Wolfram, Mathematica (2009).
URL http://www.wolfram.com/
[26] G. Pacini, R. Bergman, Minmod: a computer program to calculate insulin
sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intra-
venous glucose tolerance test, Comput.Methods.Programs.Biomed. 23 (2)
(1986) 113{122.
[27] AEgis, acslx (2008).
URL http://www.acslx.com/
[28] P. Docherty, J. Chase, T. Lotz, C. Hann, G. Shaw, J. Berkeley, J. Mann,
K. McAuley, DISTq: An iterative analysis of glucose data for low-cost,
real-time and accurate estimation of insulin sensitivity, The Open Medical
Informatics Journal 3 (2009) 65{76.
[29] T. F. Lotz, J. G. Chase, K. A. McAuley, G. M. Shaw, X. W. Wong, J. Lin,
A. Lecompte, C. E. Hann, J. I. Mann, Monte Carlo analysis of a new model-
based method for insulin sensitivity testing, Comput Method Programs
Biomed 89 (2008) 215{25.
[30] A. Mari, A. Valerio, A Circulatory Model for the Estimation of Insulin
Sensitivity, Control Eng Practice 5 (1997) 1747{52.
[31] R. Watanabe, R. Bergman, Accurate measurement of endogenous insulin
secretion does not require separate assessment of c-peptide kinetics, Dia-
betes 49 (3) (2000) 373{382.
[32] M. O'Connor, H. Landahl, G. Grodsky, Comparison of storage- and signal-
limited models of pancreatic insulin secretion, Am.J.Physiol. 238 (5) (1980)
R378{R389.
[33] F. R. Kaufman, L. C. Gibson, M. Halvorson, S. Carpenter, L. K. Fisher,
P. Pitukcheewanont, A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring
system: Clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric
type 1 diabetic subjects, Diabetes care 24 (12) (2001) 2030{2034.
[34] M. Ibbini, A PI-fuzzy logic controller for the regulation of blood glucose
level in diabetic patients, J Med Eng Technolo 30 (2006) 83{92.