Turley, G. A., Ahmed, S. M. Y., Williams, M. A. (Mark A.) and Griffin, Damian R.. (2011) Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty. Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, Vol.225 (No.8). pp. 769-782. ISSN 2041-3033

Preview	Text WRAP_Turley_Turley Paper 1.pdf - Accepted Version Download (821Kb) | Preview
Preview	Text (Cover sheet) WRAP_turley_coversheet_ASTRO.pdf - Other Download (48Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Range of motion of the hip joint is a major contributor to dislocation post total hip replacement. Impingement is often treated as a surrogate for dislocation and occurs – prosthetically – when the neck of the femoral component contacts with the rim of the pelvic acetabular cup. This impingement is caused by movement of the leg during activities of daily living. This article analyses hip joint range of motion and its implication for impingement. A systematic literature review was undertaken with the purpose of establishing a range of motion benchmark for total hip replacement. This paper proposes a method by which a three-dimensional range of motion boundary established from the literature can be presented. The nominal boundary is also validated experimentally using a number of configurations of a neutral hip joint coordinate frame.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > RD Surgery T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Total hip replacement, Joints -- Range of motion, Hip joint -- Dislocation
Journal or Publication Title:	Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proceedings. Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Publisher:	Sage Publications Ltd.
Place of Publication:	University of Warwick
ISSN:	2041-3033
Date:	16 June 2011
Volume:	Vol.225
Number:	No.8
Number of Pages:	14
Page Range:	pp. 769-782
Identification Number:	10.1177/0954411911409306
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Nikon Metrology (Firm), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
References:	1. Enocson, A., Hedbeck, C.J., Tidermark, J., Pettersson, H., Ponzer, S., and Lapidus, L.J. Dislocation of total hip replacement in patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop 2009, 80, 184-189. 2. Soong, M., Rubash, H.E., Macaulay, W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 2004, 12, 314-321. 3. Hemmerich, A., Brown, H., Smith, S., Marthandam, S., and Wyss, U. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. J Orthop Res 2006, 24, 770-781. 4. Mulholland, S.J., and Wyss, U.P. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001, 24, 191-198. 5. Kluess, D., Martin, H., Mittelmeier, W., Schmitz, K.P., and Bader, R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29, 465-471. 6. Nadzadi, M., Pedersen, D., Yack, H., Callaghan, J., and Brown T. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. J Biomech 2003, 36, 577-591. 7. Khan, M.A., Brakenbury, P., and Reynolds, I. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1981, 63, 214-218. 8. DiGioia, A.M., Jaramaz, B., Blackwell, M., Simon, D.A., Morgan, F., Moody, J.E., Nikou, C., Colgan, B.D., Aston, C.A., Labarca, R.S., Krischell, E., and Kanade, T. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat R 1998, 355, 8-22. 9. Lewinnek, G., Lewis, J., Tarr, R., Compere, C., and Zimmerman, J. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978, 60, 217-220. 10. Morrey, B.F. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 1992, 23, 237-248. 11. Woo, R.Y., and Morrey, B.F.. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982, 64, 1295-1306. 12. Scifert, C.F., Noble, P.C., Brown, T.D., Bartz, R.L., Kadakia, N., Sugano, N., Johnston, R.C., Pedersen, D.R., and Callaghan, J.J. Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Orthop Clin N Am 2001, 32, 553-567. 13. D'Lima, D.D., Urquhart, A.G., Buehler, K.O., Walker, R.H., and Colwell, C.W. The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000, 82, 315-321. 14. Nadzadi, M.E., Pedersen, D.R., Callaghan, J.J., and Brown, T.D. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2002, 17, 32-40. 15. Sariali, E., Lazennac, J.Y., Khiami, F., and Cantonné, Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: Evaluation of abduction angle, femoral head offset and head diameter. Acta Orthop 2009, 80, 277-282. 16. Seki, M., Yuasa, N., and Ohkuni, K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998, 16, 513-517. 17. Thornberry, R.L., and Hogan, A.J. The Combined Use of Simulation and Navigation to Demonstrate Hip Kinematics. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009, 91, 144-152. 18. Widmer, K.H., and Zurfluh, B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22, 815-821. 19. Yoshimine, F. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech 2005, 38, 125-132. 20. Johnston, R.C., and Smidt, G.L. Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin Orthop Relat R 1970, 72, 205-215. 21. Ko, B.H., and Yoon, Y.S. Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation. Clin Biomech 2008, 23, 996-1003. 22. Davis, K.E., Ritter, M.A., Berend, M.E., and Meding, J.B. The Importance of Range of Motion after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat R 2007, 465, 180:184. 23. Ahlberg, A., Moussa, M., and Al-Nahdi, M,. On geographical variations in the normal range of joint motion. Clin Orthop Relat R 1988, 234, 229-231. 24. Amstutz, H.C., Lodwig, R., Schurman, D., and Hodgson, A. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements: a comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Relat R 1975, 111, 124-130. 25. Barrack, R.L., Lavernia, C., Ries, M., Thornberry, R., and Tozakoglou, E.. Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 2001, 32, 569-577. 26. Burroughs, B.R., Golladay, G.J., Hallstrom, B., and Harris, W.H. A novel constrained acetabular liner design with increased range of motion. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16, 31-36. 27. Burroughs, B.R., Hallstrom, B., Golladay, G.J., Hoeffel, D., and Harris W.H. Range of Motion and Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty With 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm Femoral Head Sizes An In Vitro Study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20, 11-19. 28. Boone, D.C., and Azen, S.P. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1979, 61, 756-759. 29. Chandler, D.R., Glousman, R., Hull, D., McGuire, P.J., Kim, I.S., Clarke, I.C., and Sarmiento, A. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement: the effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop Relat R 1982, 166, 284-291. 30. Hagio, K., Sugano, N., Nishii, T., Miki, H., Otake, Y., Hattori, A., Suzuki, N., Yonenobu, K., Yoshikawa, H., and Ochi, T. A novel system of four-dimensional motion analysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2004, 22, 665-670. 31. Jaramaz, B., DiGioia, A., Blackwell, M., and Nikou, C. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement: Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: Medical robotics and image guided surgery. Clin Orthop Relat R 1998, 354, 70-81. 32. Kessler, O., Patil, S., Stefan, W., Mayr, E., Colwell, C.W., and D'Lima, D.D. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res 2008, 26, 443-452. 33. Krushell, R.J., Burke, D.W., and Harris, W.H. Elevated-rim acetabular components: Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991, 6, S53-S58. 34. Miki, H., Yamanashi, W., Nishii, T., Sato, Y., Yoshikawa, H., and Sugano, N. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22, 946-952. 35. Pedersen, D., Callaghan, J., and Brown, T. Activity-dependence of the "safe zone" for impingement versus dislocation avoidance. Med Eng Phys 2005, 27, 323-328. 36. Piazza, S.J., Erdemir, A., Okita, N., and Cavanagh, P.R. Assessment of the functional method of hip joint center location subject to reduced range of hip motion. J Biomech 2004, 37, 349-356. 37. Roaas, A., and Andersson, G.B.J. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. Acta Orthop 1982, 53, 205-208. 38. Roach, K.E., and Miles, T.P. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther 1991, 71, 656-665. 39. Stuchin, S.A. Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008, 90, 52-56. 40. Sun, H., Inaoka, H., Fukuoka, Y., Masuda, T., Ishida, A., and Morita, S. Range of motion measurement of an artificial hip joint using CT images. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007, 45, 1229-1235. 41. Widmer, K.H., and Majewski M. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2005, 20, 723-728. 42. Yoshimine, F. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfil the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech 2006, 39, 1315-1323. 43. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Joint motion: method of measuring and recording, 1965 (Chicago). 44. Cailliet, R. Soft tissue pain and disability, 1978, pp 196:215 (Philidelphia: FA Davis Co). 45. Cole, T.M. Goniometry: The measurement of joint motion, 1971, pp 40-44 (WB Saunders). 46. Costigan, P.A., Deluzio, K.J., and Wyss, U.P. Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing. Gait Posture 2002, 16, 31-37. 47. Daniels, L., and Worthingham, C. Muscle testing: techniques of manual examination, 1972 (WB Saunders). 48. Gajdosik, R.L., and Bohannon, R.W. Clinical measurement of range of motion: review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther 1987, 67, 1867-1872. 49. Green, W.B.B. [E], and Heckman, J.D. [E]. The clinical measurement of joint motion, 1994, pp 99-114 (Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons). 50. Hoppenfeld, S., and Hutton, R. Physical examination of the spine and extremities, 1976 (Prentice Hall). 51. James, B., and Parker, A.W. Active and passive mobility of lower limb joints in elderly men and women. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1989, 68, 162-167. 52. Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Range of joint motion and method of measurement, 1995 (Tokyo). 53. Kendall, H.O., Kendall, F.P., and Wadsworth, G.E. Muscles testing and function, 1971 (Baltimore). 54. Kummer, F.J., Shah, S., Iyer, S., and DiCesare, P.E. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14, 509-513. 55. Mohr, T. Musculoskeletal Analysis: the Hip, 1989, pp 369-380 (Lippincott, 1989). 56. Rowe, P., Myles, C., Walker, C., and Nutton, R. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 2000, 12, 143-155. 57. Weiss, J.M., Noble, P.C., Conditt, M.A., Kohl, H.W., Roberts, S., Cook, K.F., Gordon, M.J., and Mathis, K.B. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat R 2002, 404, 172-188. 58. Johnston, R.C., and Smidt, G.L. Measurement of hip joint motion during walking: evaluation of an electrogoniometric method. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969, 51, 1083-1094. 59. Kadaba, M., Ramakrishnan, H., and Wootten, M. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthopaedic Res 1990, 8, 383:392. 60. Noble, P.C., Sugano, N., Johnston, J.D., Thompson, M.T., Conditt, M.A., Engh, C.A., and Mathis, K.B. Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position? Clin Orthop Relat R 2003, 417, 242-252. 61. Nonaka, H., Mita, K., Watakabe, M., Akataki, K., Suzuki, N., Okuwa, T., and Yabe, K. Age-related changes in the interactive mobility of the hip and knee joints: a geometrical analysis. Gait Posture 2002, 15, 236-243. 62. Svenningsen, S., Terjesen, T., Auflem, M., and Berg, V. Hip motion related to age and sex. Acta Orthop 1989, 60, 97-100. 63. Grood E.S., and Suntay W.J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983, 105, 136-144. 64. Wu G., Siegler S., Allard P., Kirtley C., Leardini, A., Rosenbaum D., et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 2002, 35, 543-548. 65. Cappozzo, A., Della Croce, U., Leardini, A., and Chiari, L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry – Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture 2005, 21, 186-196. 66. Chezea, L., Dumasa, R., Comteta, J.J., Rumelharta, C., and Fayeta, M. A joint coordinate system proposal for the study of the trapeziometacarpal joint kinematics. Comput Method Biomech 2009, 12, 277-282. 67. Cheng, P.L. Joint rotation between two attitudes in the spherical rotation coordinate system. J Biomech 2004, 37, 1475-1482. 68. Camomilla, V., Cereatti, A., Vannozzi, G., and Cappozzo, A. An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method. J Biomech 2006, 39, 1096-1106. 69. Cheng, P.L., Nicol, A.C., and Paul, J.P. Determination of axial rotation angles of limb segments-a new method. J Biomech 2000, 33, 837-843. 70. Heading, J. Matrix theory for physicists, 1958 (Longmans, Green). 71. Kuipers, J.B. Quaternions and rotation sequences: A primer with applications to orbits, aerospace, and virtual reality, 1999, 1st Edition (Princeton University Press). 72. Murray, R.M., Li, Z., Sastry, S., and Sastry, S.S. A mathematical introduction to robotic manipulation, 1994 (CRC Press). 73. Dandachli, W., Richards, R., Sauret, V., and Cobb J.P. The transverse pelvic plane: A new and practical reference frame for hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2006, 11, 322-326.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35498

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item