The Library

Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications

Tools

Karmaker, Bue, Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin, Chung, Donna and Clarke, Aileen, 1955-. (2011) Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications. International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol.10 (No.20). ISSN 1475-9276

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Clarke_1475-9276-10-20.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (288Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-20

Abstract

Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) usually undertaken between the ages of 1-9 years and is widely practised in some part of Africa and by migrants from African countries in other parts of the world. Laws prohibit FGM in almost every country. FGM can cause immediate complications (pain, bleeding and infection) and delayed complications (sexual, obstetric, psychological problems). Several factors have been associated with an increased likelihood of FGM. In Burkina Faso, the prevalence of FGM appears to have increased in recent years. Methods: We investigated social, demographic and economic factors associated with FGM in Burkina Faso using the 2003 Demographic Health Survey (DHS). The DHS is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (multistage stratified random sampling of households) of women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Associations between potential risk factors and the prevalence of FGM were explored using c2 and t-tests and Mann Whitney U-test as appropriate. Logistic regression modelling was used to investigate social, demographic and economic risk factors associated with FGM. Main outcome measures: i) whether a woman herself had had FGM; ii) whether she had one or more daughters with FGM. Results: Data were available on 12,049 women. Response rates by region were at least 90%. Women interviewed were representative of the underlying populations of the different regions of Burkina Faso. Seventy seven percent (9267) of the women interviewed had had FGM. 7336 women had a daughter of whom 2216 (30.2%) had a daughter with FGM and 334 (4.5%) said that they intended that their daughter should have it. Univariate analysis showed that age, religion, wealth, ethnicity, literacy, years of education, household affluence, region and who had responsibility for health care decisions in the household had (RHCD) were all significantly related to the two outcomes (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis stratified by religion mainly confirmed these findings, however, education is significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of FGM only for Christian women. Conclusions and Policy implications: Factors associated with FGM are varied and complex. Younger women and those from specific groups and religions are less likely to have had FGM. A higher level of education may be protective for women from certain religions. Policies should capitalize on these findings and religious leaders should be involved in continuing programmes of action.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Female circumcision -- Burkina Faso
Journal or Publication Title:	International Journal for Equity in Health
Publisher:	BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN:	1475-9276
Date:	18 May 2011
Volume:	Vol.10
Number:	No.20
Identification Number:	10.1186/1475-9276-10-20
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	1. UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund): Promoting Gender Equality. Frequently Asked Questions on Female genital Mutilation/Cutting.[http:// www.unfpa.org/gender/practices2.htm]. 2. World Health Organisation factsheet on Female genital mutilation (May 2008). [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/], (accessed 26 March 2009). 3. Islam MM, Uddin MM: Female Circumcision in Sudan: Future Prospects and Strategies for Eradication. International Family Planning Perspectives 2001, 27(2):71-76. 4. Walraven Walraven G, Scherf C, West B, Ekpo G, Paine K, Coleman R, Bailey R, Morison L: The burden of reproductive-organ disease in rural women in the Gambia, West Africa. Lancet 2001, 357(9263):1161-1167. 5. Statistics Norway: Immigrant population. [http://www.ssb.no/english/ subjects/02/01/10/innvbef_en/arkiv/tab-2007-05-24-01-en.html]. 6. Cameron J, Anderson KR: ’Circumcision’, culture, and health-care provision in Tower Hamlets, London. Gender and Development 1998, 6(3):48-54. 7. UN Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN). [http://www.afrika. no/Detailed/19617.html]. 8. TOSTAN. 2010 [http://www.tostan.org/web/page/644/sectionid/548/ pagelevel/3/interior.asp]. 9. KMG, Ethiopia. [http://www.kmgselfhelp.org/]. 10. Faso Burkina: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.[http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Burkina_Faso]. 11. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): Human Development Index 2010.. 12. DHS (Demographic and Health Surveys), 1990 - 2004 Female Genital Cutting (FGC) Data. [http://www.measuredhs.com/topics/gender/fgc-cd/ start.cfm]. 13. Yoder PS, Abderrahim N, Zhuzhuni A: DHS Comparative Reports; No 7: Female Genital Cutting in the Demographic and Health Surveys: A Critical and Comparative Analysis Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro; 2004. 14. Freymeyer RH, Johnson BE: An exploration of attitudes toward female genital cutting in Nigeria. Popul Res Policy Rev 2007, 26:69-83. 15. Kandala N-B, Nwakeze N, Ngianga KShadrack II: The Spatial Distribution of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Nigeria. American Journal of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 2009, 81(5). 16. Leonard L: Female Circumcision in Southern Chad: Origins, meaning and current practice. Social Science & Medicine 1996, 43:255-263. 17. Ben-Ari N: Changing tradition to safeguard women. Africa Recovery (United Nations); 2003, 17(4)[http://www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/afrec/ vol17no1/171wm1.htm].
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35504