Anderson, Paul E. and Smith, J. Q., 1953- (2006) Bayesian representations using chain event graphs. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for Research in Statistical Methodology, Coventry.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Anderson_06-08w.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (431Kb)

Abstract

Bayesian networks (BNs) are useful for coding conditional independence statements between a given set of measurement variables. On the other hand, event trees (ETs) are convenient for representing asymmetric structure and how situations unfold. In this paper we report the development of a new graphical framework for discrete probability models called the Chain Event Graph (CEG). The class of CEG models contains finite BNs as a special case. Unlike the BN, the CEG is equally appropriate for representing conditional independencies in asymmetric systems and does not need dependent variables to be specified in advance. As with the BN, it also provides a framework for learning relevant conditional probabilities and propagation. Furthermore, being a function of an ET, the CEG is a more exible way of representing various causal hypotheses than the BN. This new framework is illustrated throughout by a biological regulatory network: the tryptophan metabolic pathway in the bacterium E. coli.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Statistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Graphical modeling (Statistics), Biological control systems -- Mathematical models, Escherichia coli -- Mathematical models, Bayesian statistical decision theory
Series Name:	Working papers
Publisher:	University of Warwick. Centre for Research in Statistical Methodology
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	2006
Volume:	Vol.2006
Number:	No.8
Number of Pages:	20
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC), BioSim
References:	[1] C. Boutilier, N. Friedman, M. Goldszmidt, and D. Koller. Context- Specific Independence in Bayesian Networks. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-96), pages 115{123, San Francisco, CA, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. [2] R. E. Bryant. Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipula- tion. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 35(8):677{691, 1986. [3] H. J. Call and W. A. Miller. A Comparison of Approaches and Imple- mentations for Automating Decision Analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 30:115{162, 1990. [4] N. A. Campbell and J. B. Reece. Biology. Addison Wesley Student Series. Benjamin Cummings, 6th edition, 2002. [5] R. G. Cowell, A. P. Dawid, S. L. Laurtizen, and D. J. Spiegelhalter. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1999. [6] D. Geiger, D. Heckerman, and C. Meek. Asymptotic model selection for directed networks with hidden variables. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-96), pages 283{290, Portland, OR, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. [7] J. Ito and I. P. Crawford. Regulation of the Enzymes of the Tryptophan Pathway in Escherichia Coli. Genetics, 52:1303{1316, 1965. [8] M. Jaeger. Probabilistic decision graphs | combining verification and AI techniques for probabilistic inference. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzzi- ness and Knowledge-based Systems, 12:19{42, 2004. [9] S. L. Lauritzen. Causal inference from graphical models. In O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D. R. Cox, and C. Kluppelberg, editors, Complex Stochastic Systems, pages 63{108. London: Chapman and Hall, 2001. [10] David McAllester, Michael Collins, and Fernando Pereira. Case-Factor Diagrams for Structured Probability Modelling. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI- 04), pages 382{391, 2004. [11] S. M. Olmsted. On representing and solving decision problems. PhD thesis, Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, 1983. [12] J. Pearl. Causality, models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2000. [13] David Poole and Nevin Lianwen Zhang. Exploiting Contextual Inde- pendence in Probabilistic Inference. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 18:263{313, 2003. [14] E. Riccomagno and J. Q. Smith. Chain Event Graphs to Represent Bayesian Causal Hypotheses. CRiSM paper, Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, 2006. [15] M. Santillan and M. C. Mackey. Dynamic regulation of the trypto- phan operon: A modeling study and comparison with experimental data. PNAS, 98(4):1364{1369, 2001. [16] J. W. Schimd, K. Mauch, M. Reuss, E. D. Gilles, and A. Kremling. Metabolic design based on a coupled gene expression | metabolic net- work model of tryptophan production in Escherichia coli. Metabolic Engineering, 6:364{377, 2004. [17] G. Shafer. The Art of Causal Conjecture. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1996. [18] Jim Q. Smith and Paul E. Anderson. Conditional independence and chain event graphs. Artificial Intelligence, 2006. Accepted, subject to revision. [19] R. Somerville. The trp repressor, a ligand-activated regulatory protein. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol., 42:1{38, 1992. [20] D. J. Spiegelhalter, A. P. Dawid, S. L. Lauritzen, and R. G. Cowell. Bayesian analysis in expert systems (with discussion). Statistical Sci- ence, 8:219{83, 1993. [21] P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, and R. Scheines. Causation, Prediction, and Search. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993. [22] B. Thiesson, C. Meek, D. M. Chickering, and D. Heckerman. Compu- tationally Efficient Methods for Selecting Among Mixtures of Graphical Models. In Bayesian Statistics, volume 6, pages 631{656. Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1999. [23] P. Thwaites and J. Q. Smith. Non-symmetric Models, Chain Event Graphs and Propagation. In Proceedings of IPMU, July 2006. To appear.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35567

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item