The Library
A comparison of Markov-functional and market models : the one-dimensional case
Tools
Bennett, Michael N. and Kennedy, J. E.. (2005) A comparison of Markov-functional and market models : the one-dimensional case. The Journal of Derivatives, Vol.13 (No.2). pp. 22-43.
|
PDF
WRAP_Bennett_05-11w.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (568Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jod.2005.605351
Abstract
The LIBOR Markov-functional model is an efficient arbitrage-free pricing model suitable for callable interest rate derivatives. We demonstrate that the one-dimensional LIBOR Markov-functional model and the separable onefactor LIBOR market model are very similar. Consequently, the intuition behind the familiar SDE formulation of the LIBOR market model may be applied to the LIBOR Markov-functional model. The application of a drift approximation to a separable one-factor LIBOR market model results in an approximating model driven by a one-dimensional Markov process, permitting efficient implementation. For a given parameterisation of the driving process, we find the distributional structure of this model and the corresponding Markov-functional model are numerically virtually indistinguishable for short maturity tenor structures over a wide variety of market conditions, and both are very similar to the market model. A theoretical uniqueness result shows that any accurate approximation to a separable market model that reduces to a function of the driving process is effectively an approximation to the analogous Markov-functional model. Therefore, our conclusions are not restricted to our particular choice of driving process. Minor differences are observed for longer maturities, nevertheless the models remain qualitatively similar. These differences do not have a large impact on Bermudan swaption prices. Under stress-testing, the LIBOR Markov-functional and separable LIBOR market models continue to exhibit similar behaviour and Bermudan prices under these models remain comparable. However, the drift approximation model now appears to admit arbitrage that is practically significant. In this situation, we argue the Markov-functional model is a more appropriate choice for pricing.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Statistics |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Markov processes, Interest rates -- Econometric models |
| Journal or Publication Title: | The Journal of Derivatives |
| Publisher: | Institutional Investor * Journals |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Volume: | Vol.13 |
| Number: | No.2 |
| Page Range: | pp. 22-43 |
| Identification Number: | 10.3905/jod.2005.605351 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| References: | Andersen, L. & Andreasen, J. [2000], ‘Volatility skews and extensions of the LIBOR market model’, Applied Mathematical Finance 7(1), 1–32. Brace, A., G¸atarek, D. & Musiela, M. [1997], ‘The market model of interest rate dynamics’, Mathematical Finance 7(2), 127–155. Carverhill, A. [1994], ‘When is the short rate Markovian?’, Mathematical Finance 4(4), 305–312. Hull, J. & White, A. [1990], ‘Pricing interest rate derivative securities’, The Review of Financial Studies 3(4), 573–592. Hunt, P. J., Kennedy, J. E. & Pelsser, A. A. J. [2000], ‘Markov-functional interest rate models’, Finance and Stochastics 4(4), 391–408. Hunt, P. & Kennedy, J. [2000], Financial derivatives in theory and practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Hunt, P. & Kennedy, J. [2005], ‘Longstaff-Schwartz, effective model dimensionality and reducible Markov-functional models’. Working Paper (available from www.ssrn.com). Hunter, C., J¨ackel, P. & Joshi, M. [2001], ‘Getting the drift’, Risk Magazine (July). Jamshidian, F. [1997], ‘LIBOR and swap market models and measures’, Fi- nance and Stochastics 1, 293–330. Kurbanmaradov, O., Sabelfield, K. & Shoenmakers, J. [2002], ‘Lognormal approximations to LIBOR market models’, Journal of Computational Finance 6(1). Longstaff, F. & Schwartz, E. [2001], ‘Valuing american options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach’, The Review of Financial Studies 14(1), 113–147. Milterson, K., Sandmann, K. & Sondermann, D. [1997], ‘Closed form solutions for term structure derivatives with log-normal interest rates’, Journal of Finance 52(1), 409–430. Pelsser, A. & Pietersz, R. [2004], ‘A comparison of single-factor Markovfunctional and multi-factor market models’. Working Paper (available from www.few.eur.nl/few/people/pelsser). Pelsser, A., Pietersz, R. & van Regenmortel, M. [2004], ‘Fast driftapproximated pricing in the BGM model’, Journal of Computational Finance 8(1), 93–124. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35586 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

