Walker, Louise (Researcher in politics) (2010) Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) : institutional innovation and the challenge to development evaluation. Working Paper. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation: University of Warwick. (Working Papers, Vol.2010).

PDF WRAP_Walker_26310.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (236Kb)

Abstract

This paper explores how GHIs as a form of institutional innovation are challenging the practice of development evaluation. It begins with a discussion of GHIs and criticisms or questions they have faced on accountability, sustainability and systems impact. It then outlines the short history of development evaluation and discusses how GHIs are pushing its practice towards a broader application of evaluation, performance evaluation. The paper discusses some of the strategic and political applications of evaluation and looks at systems impact, particularly vertical interventions and health systems strengthening, to illustrate the conceptual challenges that GHIs’ interventions can raise with respect to evaluation and how evaluation practice lags behind GHIs’ innovation. Finally, the paper looks at the Global Fund’s Five-Year Evaluation as an example of performance evaluation and how this evaluation addressed or failed to address external commentaries on its accountability,sustainability and systems impact. The paper concludes with some observations about the relationship between institutional innovation and performance evaluation.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) J Political Science > JZ International relations R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	World health, Public health -- International cooperation, Economic development projects -- Evaluation, Evaluation research (Social action programs)
Series Name:	Working Papers
Publisher:	University of Warwick
Place of Publication:	Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Date:	2010
Volume:	Vol.2010
Number:	No.263
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Bartsch, Sonja (2007) ‘The Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria’, Wolfgang Hein, Sonja Bartsch and Lars Kohlmorg, eds., Global Health Governance and the Fight against HIV/AIDS. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 146- 171. Benner, Thorsten, Wolfgang H. Reinicke, and Jan Martin Witte (2004) ‘Multisectoral Networks in Global Governance: Towards a Pluralistic System of Accountability’, Government and Opposition, 39(2) pp. 192-210. Biesma, Regien, Ruairi Brugha, Andrew Harmer, Aisling Walsh, Neil Spicer and Gill Walt (2009) ‘The Effects of Global Health Initiatives on Country Health Systems: A review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control’, Health Policy and Planning, 24, pp. 239- 252. Brugha, Ruairi, Martine Donoghue, Mary Starling, Phillimon Ndubani, Freddie Ssengooba, Bendita Fernandes, Gill Walt (2004) ‘The Global Fund: Managing great expectations’ Lancet, 364, pp. 95-100. Buse, Kent (2004) ‘Governing Public-Private Infectious Disease Partnerships’, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, X (2) pp. 225-242. Buse, Kent and Gill Walt (2000a) ‘Global public–private partnerships: Part I – A new development in health?’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization,78(4) pp. 549-61. Buse, Kent and Gill Walt (2000b) ‘Global Public-Private Partnerships: Part II-What are the health issues for global governance?’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(5) pp. 699-709. Conlin, Sean and Roderick L. Stirrat (2008) ‘Current Challenges in Development Evaluation’, Evaluation, 14, 2008, pp. 193-208. DAC Network on Development Evaluation (2006) ‘Draft Principles and Standards for the Evaluation of Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs)’ prepared by the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) of the World Bank for consideration at the 5th meeting of the DAC Network on Development Evaluation, 16 – 17 November 2006. Forman, Shepard and Derk Segaar (2006) ‘New Coalitions for Global Governance: The Changing Dynamics of Multilateralism’, Global Governance, 12, pp. 205-225. Grant, Ruth W. and Robert O. Keohane (2005) ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 99(1) pp. 29-43. Hsaio, William C. (2007) ‘Why is a Systemic View of Health Financing Necessary?’, Health Affairs, 26(4) pp. 950-61. IHP+, ‘Welcome to the International Health Partnership and related initiatives’. http://www.internationalhealthpartnership.net/en/home. Accessed August 25, 2009. Khoubesserian, Caroline (2009) ‘Global Health Initiatives: A Health Governance Response?’ in Andrew F. Cooper and John J. Kirton, eds, Innovation in Global Health Governance: Critical Cases. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 285- 306. Kirton, John J. and Andrew F. Cooper (2009) ‘Innovation in Global Health Governance’, Andrew F. Cooper and John J. Kirton, eds., Innovation in Global Health Governance: Critical Cases. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 309-331. Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2004) ‘Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability’, Government and Opposition, 39(2) pp. 235-59. Lee, Kelley (2009) ‘The World Health Organization (WHO)’, Thomas G. Weiss and Rorden Wilkinson, eds., Routledge Global Institutions. New York: Routledge. Lob-Levyt, Julian and Michel Kazatchkine (2009) in a letter to The Honorable Gordon Brown and Robert Bruce Zoellick. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the GAVI Alliance. MACRO International (2007) Evaluation of the Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria: Results from Study Area 1 of the Five-Year Evaluation. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. MACRO International (2008) Evaluation of the Global Fund Partner Environment, at Global and Country Levels, in Relation to Grant Performance and Health System Effects, Including 16 Country Studies. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. MACRO International (2009) Final Report: Global Fund Five-Year Evaluation: Study Area 3 – The Impact of Collective Efforts on the Reduction of the Disease Burden of AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Marchal, Bruno, Anna Cavalli and Guy Kegels (2009) ‘Global Health Actors Claim to Support Health System Strengthening—Is This Reality or Rhetoric?’, PLoS Medicine, 6 (4), pp. 1-5. McKinsey (2005) Global Health Partnerships: Assessing Country Consequences. McKinsey and Company. OECD (1991) Development Assistance Committee: Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance. Paris. OECD (1998) ‘Review of the DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance’, p. 58, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/21/39/35343480.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2009. OECD, DAC Network on Development Evaluation, ‘Members of the DAC Network on Development Evaluation’, http://www.oecd.org/document/62/0,3343,en_21571361_34047972_34518718_1_1_1 _1,00.html. Accessed May 29, 2009. Pawson, Ray and Nick Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage. Reich, Michael R., Keizo Takemi, Marc J. Roberts and William C. Hsiao (2008) ‘Global Action on Health Systems: A Proposal for the Toyako G8 Summit’, Lancet, 371, pp. 865-9. Roll Back Malaria Partnership, ‘What is the RBM Partnership?’. http://www.rollbackmalaria.org/rbmorganigram.html. Accessed August 21, 2009. Sanderson, Ian (2000) ‘Evaluation in Complex Policy Systems’ Evaluation, 6, pp. 433-454. Sridhar, Devi and Rajaie Batniji (2008) ‘Misfinancing Global Health: A case for transparency in disbursements and decision making’, Lancet, 372, pp. 1185–91. Stillman, Kate and Sara Bennett (2005) System-wide Effects of the Global Fund: Interim Findings from Three Country Studies. Partners for Health Reformplus and Abt Associates Inc. TDR, Making a Difference: 30 Years of Research and Capacity Building in Tropical Diseases. http://apps.who.int/tdr/svc/publications/about-tdr/30-year-history/makingdifference#_ Phase_I. Accessed August 25, 2009. The Diflucan Partnership Program, http://www.diflucanpartnership.org/en/welcome/Default.aspx. Accessed August 25, 2009. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, ‘About the Global Fund’, http://theglobalfund.org/en/about/?lang=en. Accessed December 10, 2008. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, ‘Donors Assess Global Fund Resource Needs’, April 1, 2009. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/pressreleases/?pr=pr_090401. Accessed August 25, 2009. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, ‘Pledges & Contributions’, http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/pledges/?lang=en. Accessed December 21, 2009. The Global Fund, ‘The Global Fund Becomes an Administratively Autonomous Institution’, December 18, 2009. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/pressreleases/?pr=pr_081219. Accessed August 25, 2009. Technical Evaluation Reference Group (2006) Framework Document on the Scale and Scope of the Five-Year Evaluation. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Technical Evaluation Reference Group (2007) Study Area 1: Summary Paper on Study Area 1 - Organizational Efficiency & Effectiveness. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Technical Evaluation Reference Group (2009) Technical Evaluation Reference Group Summary Paper: Study Area 3 – Health Impact of Scaling Up Against HIV, Tuberculosis and Malaria: Evaluation of the Current Situation and Trends in 18 Countries. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Technical Evaluation Reference Group (Updated 2008) ‘Study Area 1 – Global Fund Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness’, Evaluation Brief No. 6, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, pp. 1-2. The World Bank (IEG) and the OECD (DAC Network for Development Evaluation) (2007) Sourcebook for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs: Indicative Principles and Standards. Washington. The World Bank (no date) The LogFrame Handbook: A Logical Framework Approach to Project Cycle Management. Washington. The World Health Organization (2007) ‘Everybody’s Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes – WHO’s Framework for Action’. Geneva. United Nations (2001) Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration: Report of the Secretary-General, A/56/326, New York, pp. 56-8. World Health Organization (2001) http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2001/en/state2001-12.html. Accessed December 10, 2008. World Health Organization Maximizing Positive Synergies Collaborative Group (2009) ‘An Assessment of Interaction between Global Health Initiatives and Country Health Systems’, Lancet, 373, pp. 2137-69. Zacher, Mark W. and Tania J. Keefe (2008) The Politics of Global Health Governance. New York and Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3565

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item