Richardson, Ben, 1982- (2010) From Doha to El Dorado? : the WTO, agricultural liberalisation and the false promise of free markets. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation.

PDF WRAP_Richardson_26610.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (293Kb)

Abstract

The trade talks at the Doha Round of the World Trade Organisation have stuttered along since 2001 with seemingly little prospect for conclusion. Nevertheless, the conviction remains that the round should be finished lest significant economic gains be passed over and the long run trading interests of developing countries damaged. In this reading, it is insufficient political will among world leaders that has prevented poor countries from moving towards a fair and free trading environment. By bringing to light the manifest uncertainties that hang over such attempts to instil free market principles on the agricultural economy however, this paper sounds three sceptical notes on the idea that progressive liberalisation through the WTO can deliver a development boon. First, choosing the right path to liberalisation is confounded by the fact that negotiators are unsure of the value of certain concessions and so may deviate down a ‘sub-optimal’ route. Second, the belief that the ‘uneven playing field’ will be ultimately levelled as trade-distorting policies are gradually eroded ignores the persistent renewal of government involvement in agriculture as policy instruments evolve over time. Third, to the extent that liberalisation does occur, its benefits are assumed rather than given. By looking at Brazil, a country expected to be one of the prime beneficiaries of a successful roll-back in agricultural protectionism, it is shown how trade expansion has led to an unequal form of development that has stymied economic opportunities for the poor. Because of these three factors, it is concluded that development through liberalisation remains more an act of ideological faith than a question of willpower. As such, the purpose of the multilateral trading system must be reappraised.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	World Trade Organization, International trade, Agriculture -- Economic aspects, Developing countries -- Economic conditions
Series Name:	Working Papers
Publisher:	University of Warwick
Place of Publication:	Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Date:	2010
Volume:	Vol.2010
Number:	No.266
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Ackerman, F. and Gallagher, K. P. (2008) ‘The Shrinking Gains from Global Trade Liberalization in Computable General Equilibrium Models’, International Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 50-77. AgraFNP (2008) Biofuels Brazil, No. 37, 21 October 2008. Anderson, K., Martin, W. and Valenzuela, E. (2005) ‘The Relative Importance of Global Agricultural Subsidies and Market Access’, Paper from the World Bank Project on Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, November 2005. Anderson, K., Martin, W. and van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2006) ‘Market and Welfare Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios’, in Kym Anderson and Will Martin, eds., Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda (Washington DC: Palgrave Macmillan). Beattie, A. (2007) ‘Troubled Talks Threaten WTO’s Credibility’, Financial Times, 23 January 2007. Bergsten, C. F. (2004) ‘The G-20 and the World Economy’, Speech given at Leipzig, Germany, 4 March 2004. Borras Jr., S. (2003) ‘Questioning Market-Led Agrarian Reform’, Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 367-394. Bouët, A., Bureau, J-C, Decreux, Y. and Jean, S. (2007) ‘Multilateral Agricultural Liberalisation: The Contrasting Fortunes of Developing Countries in the Doha Round’, The World Economy, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1329-1354. Branford, S. and Rocha, J. (2002) Cutting the Wire: The Story of the Landless Movement in Brazil (London: Latin American Bureau). Brockmeier, M. and Pelikan, J. (2008) ‘Agricultural Market Access: A Moving Target in the WTO Negotiations?’, Food Policy, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 250-259. CIBE and CEFS (2007) ‘The Success of EU Sugar Regime Reform is Being Undermined by its External Trade Policy’, Joint Position Paper, 19 December 2007. Available at http://www.comitesucre.org/userfiles/CIBE%20CEFSCIBE% 20PositionPaper%2019th%20December%20full%20version.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2008. Cooper, A. F., Antikiewicz, A. and Shaw, T. M. (2006) ‘Economic Size Trumps All Else? Lessons from BRICSAM’, Centre for International Governance Innovation Working Paper, No. 12. Drache, D. and Froese, M. D. (2008) ‘Omens and Threats in the Doha Round: The Decline of Multilateralism?’, Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition Working Paper Series, 08/01. Ernst and Young (2007) ‘Biofuels Country Attractiveness Indices’, Renewable Energy Group, Q1 2007. G20 Communiqué (2005) G20 Proposal on Market Access, 12 October 2005. Available at www.agtradepolicy.org. Accessed 4 April 2008. Graz, J-C. (2004) ‘Transnational Mercantilism and the Emergent Global Trading Order’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 597-621. Gurría, A. (2008) ‘Trade Agreement Needed Now’, New York Times, 25 April 2008. Hepburn, J. (2008) Programme Officer for Agriculture at International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, interviewed in Geneva, 24 January 2008. Hoda, A. and Gulati, A. (2004) ‘Special and Differential Treatment in Agricultural Negotiations’, in Giovanni Anania, Mary Bohman, Colin Carter and Alex McCalla, eds., Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO: Where Are We Heading? (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar). International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (2005) ‘Special Products and the Safeguard Mechanism: Strategic Options for Developing Countries’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development Issue Paper, No. 6, December 2005. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (2006) ‘Chair’s Ag Market Access Paper Sparks Fierce Debate on Tariff Cuts’, BRIDGES Newsletter , Vol. 10, No. 21, 14 June 2006. Ikenson, D. (2006) ‘The WTO After Hong Kong: Where Do We Go from Here?’, Speech at Friedrich Naumann Foundation, 14 February 2006. Available at http://www.freetrade.org/node/710. Accessed 10 November 2009. Jensen, M. F. and Gibbon, P. (2007) ‘Africa and the WTO Doha Round: An Overview’, Development Policy Review,Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 5-24. Khor, M. (2002) ‘The WTO, the Post-Doha Agenda and the Future Trade System: A Development Perspective’, Paper prepared for the Asian Development Bank, May 2002 Krivonos, E. and Olarreaga, M. (2006) ‘Sugar Prices, Labour Income, and Poverty in Brazil’, World Bank Policy Research Paper, No. 3874, April 2006. Kwa, A. and Jamara, F. (2003) Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations (New York: Zed Books). Lamy, P. (2006) ‘The WTO and the Doha Round: The Way Forward’, Speech given to Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, 6 April 2006. Mançano Fernandes, B. and Constantino Gonçalves, E. (2010) ‘The Politics of Agrofuel in Brazil: Paradigms and Territorial Dispute’, Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, forthcoming. Mandelson, P. (2007) ‘Doha Clock is Ticking’, Speech given at the International Trademark Association Committee, Brussels, 11 September 2007. Martin, W. and Anderson, K. (2006) ‘The Doha Agenda Negotiations on Agriculture: What Could They Deliver?’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 1211- 1218 Maswood, S. J. (2006) The South in International Economic Regimes: Whose Globalization? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan). Messerlin, P. (2005) ‘Agricultural Liberalization in the Doha Round’, Global Economy Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4. Narlikar, A. and Tussie, D. (2004) ‘The G20 and the Cancún Ministerial: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO’, The World Economy, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 947-966. Narlikar, A. (2003) International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT and WTO (London: Routledge). Oxfam (2005) ‘Show of Unity and Strength by G20 Countries’, Oxfam Press Release, 21 March 2005. Page, S. (2004) ‘Making Doha a Better Deal for Poor Countries’, Financial Times, 26 July 2004. Panagariya, A. (2002) ‘Developing Countries at Doha: A Political Economy Analysis’, The World Economy, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 1205-1233 Payne, A. (2005) The Global Politics of Unequal Development (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan). Rede Social, ‘Direitos Humanos e a Indústria da Cana’ (São Paulo: Rede Social, 2008). Reis, E. (1998) ‘Brazil: One Hundred Years of the Agrarian Question’, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 157, pp. 419-432. Reuters (2007) ‘Brazil Peasants Storm Farms, Torch Sugar Plants’, 13 April 2007. Richardson, B. (2009) ‘Exclusive Engine of Growth: The Development Model of Brazilian Sugarcane’, Ethical Sugar Discussion Paper, January 2009. Schmitz, T., Searle, J. and Buzzanell, P. (2002) ‘Brazil’s Domination of the World Sugar Market’, in Andrew Schmitz, Thomas Spreen, William Messina and Charles Moss, eds., Sugar and Related Sweetener Markets: International Perspectives (New York: CABI Publishing). Schwab, S., United States Trade Representative, ‘Op-Ed: Still Ready to Talk’, Wall Street Journal, 11 September 2006 Smeets, E., Junginger, A., Faaij, A., Walter, R. and Dolzan, P. (2006) ‘Sustainability of Brazilian Bio-Ethanol’, Commissioned Study by Netherlands Agency for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Report NWS-E-2006-110, Utrecht, August 2006. Stevens, C., Kennan, J. and Meyn, M. (2007) ‘South-South Trade in Special Products’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development Issue Paper, No. 8, June 2007. UNCTAD (2007) Handbook of Statistics, 2006-07 (Geneva: UNCTAD). UNCTAD India (2007) Green Box Subsidies: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment (New Delhi: UNCTAD India). Weis, T. (2007) The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming (London: Zed Books). Weiss, L. (2005) ‘Global Governance, National Strategies: How Industrialized States Make Room to Move under the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 723-749. Welch, C. (2006) ‘Globalization and the Transformation of Work in Rural Brazil: Agribusiness, Rural Labour Unions, and Peasant Mobilization’, International Labor and Working-Class History, No. 70. Wheatley, J. (2007) ‘Rivals Fuelled by One Dream’, Financial Times, 26 September 2007. Wilkinson, R. (2006) The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade (London: Routledge). Wolfe, R. (2004) ‘Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Where the WTO is going after Seattle, Doha and Cancún’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 574-596. Wolford, W., ‘Producing Community: The MST and the Land Reform Settlements in Brazil’, Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2003, pp. 500-520. World Trade Organisation, ‘Revised Draft Modalities’, Committee on Agriculture Special Session, TN/AG/W/4/Rev. 1, 8 February 2008, p. 11. WTO Informant 1 (2008) Australian Delegate, 1 February 2008. WTO Informant 2 (2008) Brazilian Delegate, 23 January 2008. WTO Informant 3 (2008) Indian Delegate, 25 January 2008. WTO Informant 5 (2008) Thai Delegate, 28 January 2008.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3570

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item