Kunar, Melina A., Humphreys, Glyn W. and Smith, Kelly J.. (2003) Visual change with moving displays: more evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol.29 (No.4). pp. 779-792. ISSN 0096-1523

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Preview search with moving stimuli was investigated. The stimuli moved in multiple directions, and preview items could change either their color or their shape before onset of the new (search) displays. In Experiments 1 and 2, the authors found that (a) a preview benefit occurred even when more than 5 moving items had to be ignored, and (b) color change, but not shape change, disrupted preview search in moving stimuli. In contrast, shape change, but not color change, disrupted preview search in static stimuli (Experiments 3 and 4). Results suggest that preview search with moving displays is influenced by inhibition of a color map, whereas preview search with static displays is influenced by inhibition of locations of old distractors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Visual perception , Distraction (Psychology), Motion perception (Vision)
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	0096-1523
Date:	August 2003
Volume:	Vol.29
Number:	No.4
Page Range:	pp. 779-792
Identification Number:	10.1037/0096-1523.29.4.779
Status:	Peer Reviewed
References:	Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 93, 891–900. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458. Gibson, B. S., & Jiang, Y. H. (2001). Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 59–73. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. A. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, 181–185. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Watson, D. G. (2003). When a reappearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 185–198. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking under attentional blink conditions: More evidence for top-down limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22–42. Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52(A), 679–715. Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Humphreys, G. W., Olivers, C. N. L., Mu¨ller, K., Lohmann, G., et al. (2003). Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex—An event-related fMRI study of visual marking. NeuroImage, 18, 310–323. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65–97. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention. Cognition, 50, 363–384. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197. Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259– 290. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130–134. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In VISUAL CHANGE WITH MOVING DISPLAYS 791 D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 49–86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Watson, D. G. (2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 74–84. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946–962. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471–481. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 379–395. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433. Yantis, S., & Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally-modulated priority tags. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 166–178.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35700

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item