Assad, J. A., & Maunsell, J. (1995, February 9). Neuronal correlates of
inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 373, 518–
521.
Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of
hidden objects: Object permanence in six- and eight-month-old infants.
Cognition, 23, 21–41.
Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants:
Further evidence. Child Development, 62, 1227–1246.
Baillargeon, R., & Graber, M. (1987). Where’s the rabbit? 5.5 month-old
infants’ representation of the height of a hidden object. Cognitive Development,
2, 375–392.
Cavanagh, P. (1991). Short-range vs. long-range motion: Not a valid
distinction. Spatial Vision, 5, 303–309.
Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1997). A functional role for illusory colour
spreading in the control of focused visual attention. Perception, 26,
1397–1411.
Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark:
Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 93,
891–900.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus
similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R., A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-
dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98,
335–351.
Horowitz, T., & Treisman, A. (1994). Attention and apparent motion.
Spatial Vision, 8, 193–219.
Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Fractionating
visual marking: Dual-task decomposition of the marking state by timing
and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 28, 640–660.
Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. R. (1983). Perception of partly occluded
objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483–524.
Olivers, C. N., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets
the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down limited capacity
inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 28, 22–42.
Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual
marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension
defined conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
52A, 679–715.
Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through
occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259–
290.
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992).
Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605–632.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.
Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Verstraten, F. A. J., Cavanagh, P., & Labianca, A. T. (2000). Limits of
attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research,
40, 3651–3664.
Watson, D. G. (2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based
inhibition is not necessary. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 74–84.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing
selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old
objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving
objects: A role for top-down feature based inhibition in selection. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
24, 946–962.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for
inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics,
62, 471–481.
Yantis, S., & Gibson, B. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and
attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182–204.
Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture:
Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95–107.