Wolfe, J. M., Birnkrant, R. S., Kunar, Melina A. and Horowitz, T. S.. (2005) Visual search for transparency and opacity: attentional guidance by cue combination? Journal of Vision, Vol.5 (No.3). pp. 257-274. ISSN 1534-7362

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A series of seven experiments explored search for opaque targets among transparent distractors or vice versa. Static stimuli produced very inefficient search. With moving items, search for an opaque target among transparent distractors was quite efficient while search for transparent targets was less efficient (Experiment 1). Transparent and opaque items differed from each other on the basis of motion cues, luminance cues, and figural cues (e.g., junction type). Motion cues were not sufficient to support efficient search (Experiments 2–5). Violations of the luminance rules of transparency disrupt search (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 5 shows that search becomes inefficient if X-junctions are removed. Experiments 6 and 7 show that efficient search survives if X-junctions are occluded. It appears that guidance of attention to an opaque target is guidance based on “cue combination” (M. S. Landy, L. T. Maloney, E. B. Johnston, & M. Young, 1995). Several cues must be present to produce a difference between opaque and transparent surfaces that is adequate to guide attention.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Visual perception, Transparency, Opacity (Optics)
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Vision
Publisher:	Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
ISSN:	1534-7362
Date:	2005
Volume:	Vol.5
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 257-274
Identification Number:	10.1167/5.3.9
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Funder:	National Eye Institute
Grant number:	EY05087 (JMW)
References:	Adelson, E. H., & Anandan, P. (1990). Ordinal character-istics of transparency (pp. 77-81). Proceedings of the AAAI-90 Workshop on Qualitative Vision, Boston, MA. Journal of Vision (2005) 5, 257-274 Wolfe, Birnkrant, Kunar, & Horowitz 273 Aks, D. J., & Enns, J. T. (1993). Early vision's analysis of slant-from-texture. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vis-ual Science, 34(4), 1185. Beck, J., & Ivry, R. (1988). On the role of figural organiza-tion in perceptual transparency. Perception & Psycho-physics, 44(6), 585-594. Birnkrant, R. S., Wolfe, J. M., & Mendoza, H. (2003). Is opacity a basic feature? It's not transparent []. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 634a, http://journalofvision.org /3/9/634, doi:10.1167/3.9 634. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446. Cavanagh, P., Arguin, M., & Treisman, A. (1990). Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 479-492. Dick, M. (1989). Parallel and serial processes in motion detec-tion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458. D'Zmura, M., Rinner, O., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2000). The colors seen behind transparent filters. Perception, 29, 911-926. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychological Science, 1(5), 323-326. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98(3), 335-351. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1993). A model for the rapid discrimination of line drawing in early vision. In D. Brogan, A. Gale, & K. Carr (Eds.), Visual Search 2 (pp. 73-89). London, UK: Taylor & Francis. Enns, J. T., Rensink, R. A., & Douglas, R. (1990). The in-fluence of line relations on visual search. IOVS, 31(Suppl. 4), 105. Epstein, W., Babler, T., & Bownds, S. (1992). Attentional demands of processing shape in three-dimensional space: Evidence from visual search and precuing para-digms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Percep-tion and Performance, 18(2), 503-511. Ernst, M. O., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(4), 162-169. Foster, D. H., & Ward, P. A. (1991). Asymmetries in ori-ented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 243, 75-81. Graham, C. H. (1965). Perception of movement. In C. H. Graham (Ed.), Vision and visual perception (pp. 575-588). New York: J. Wiley and Sons. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233. Kasrai, R., & Kingdom, F. A. (2002). Achromatic transpar-ency and the role of local contours. Perception, 31, 775-790. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psy-chology, 55, 271-304. Kwak, H. W., Dagenbach, D., & Egeth, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 49(5), 473-480. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Re-search, 35(3), 389-412. Metelli, F. (1974). The perception of transparency. Scientific American, 230(4), 90-98. Michod, K. O., Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004, April 29 - May 4). Does guidance take time to develop dur-ing a visual search trial? Paper presented at the Visual Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL. Mitsudo, H. (2003). Information regarding structure and lightness based on phenomenal transparency influ-ences the efficiency of visual search. Perception, 32, 53-66. Nakayama, K., & He, J. J. (1995). Attention to surfaces: Beyond a Cartesian understanding of focal attention. In T. V. Papathomas (Ed.), Attention to surfaces: Beyond a Cartesian understanding of visual attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437-442. Rensink, R. A., & Cavanagh, P. (in press). The influence of cast shadows on visual search. Perception. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Pre-emption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psycho-logical Review, 102(1), 101-130. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505. Rosenholtz, R. (2001). Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Perception and Psychophysics, 63(3), 476-489. Royden, C. S., Wolfe, J., & Klempen, N. (2001). Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(3), 436-444. Journal of Vision (2005) 5, 257-274 Wolfe, Birnkrant, Kunar, & Horowitz 274 Singh, M., & Anderson, B. L. (2002). Toward a perceptual theory of transparency. Psychological Review, 109(3), 492-519. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495-501. Sun, J., & Perona, P. (1996). Preattentive perception of elementary three dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 36(16), 2515-2529. Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25(4), 1016-1035. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic mod-eling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psycho-logical Review, 95, 15-48. Von Grünau, M., & Dubé, S. (1994). Visual search asym-metry for viewing direction. Perception and Psychophys-ics, 56(2), 211-220. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9(1), 33-39. Wolfe, J. M., & DiMase, J. S. (2003). Do intersections serve as basic features in visual search? Perception, 32(6), 645-656. Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I., & O'Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 34-49.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35707

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item