Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Top-up search and the attentional blink: a two-stage account of the preview effect in search

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kunar, Melina A., Shapiro, Kimron L. and Humphreys, Glyn W.. (2006) Top-up search and the attentional blink: a two-stage account of the preview effect in search. Visual Cognition, Vol.13 (No.6). pp. 677-699. ISSN 1350-6285

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280500463195

Abstract

An inefficient visual search task can be facilitated if half the distractor items are presented as a preview prior to the presentation of the remaining distractor items and target. This benefit in search is termed the preview effect. Recent research has found that a preview effect can still occur if the previewed items disappear before reappearing again just before the search items (the “top-up” procedure). In this paper we investigate the attentional demands of processing during the preview and the top-up periods. Experiment 1 found that if attention is withdrawn from the top-up stage then no preview effect occurs. Likewise if attention is withdrawn from the initial preview period then the preview effect is reduced (Experiment 2). The data suggest that the preview effect is dependent on attention being paid both to the initial display and also to the re-presentation of the old display before the search display appears. The data counter accounts of preview search in terms of automatic attention capture by new items or by inhibition of return. We discuss alternative accounts of the results, and in particular suggest an amalgamation of a temporal grouping and a visual marking account of preview search.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Visual perception, Distraction (Psychology)
Journal or Publication Title: Visual Cognition
Publisher: Psychology Press
ISSN: 1350-6285
Date: 2006
Volume: Vol.13
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 677-699
Identification Number: 10.1080/13506280500463195
Status: Peer Reviewed
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC), Wellcome Trust (London, England)
Grant number: 071944
References: Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hodsoll, J. (2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carry-over effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 758-778. Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hulleman, J. (2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe-detection analysis of preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 81-101. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 891-900. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus topdown control. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242. Donk, M., & Verburg, R. (2004). Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 282-288. Humphreys, G. W., Kyllingsbaek, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., & Paulson, O. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 610-635. Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Fractionating visual marking: Dualtask decomposition of the marking state by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 640-660. Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 717-750. Jiang, Y., & Wang, S. W. (2004). What kind of memory supports visual marking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 79-91. Kunar, M. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (in press). Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: Evidence from the ‘‘top-up’’ procedure. Memory and Cognition . Kunar,M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, 181-185. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Watson, D. G. (2003). When a re-appearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 185-198. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking under attentional blink conditions: More evidence for top-down limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22-42. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking and singleton capture: Fractionating the unitary nature of visual selection. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860. Shapiro, K. L., Arnell, K. A., & Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink: A view on attention and a glimpse on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 291-296. Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1997). Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 593- 600. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90- 122. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 471-81. Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 , 180-/186. Yantis, S., & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182-204.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35711

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us