Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention.
Psychological Science, 14, 427–432.
Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2005). The onset of receding motion
captures attention: Comment on Franconeri & Simons (2003). Perception
& Psychophysics, 67, 219–223.
Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual
cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 699–
706.
Christ, S. E., & Abrams, R. A. (2006). Abrupt onsets cannot be ignored.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 875–880.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and
memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology,
36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches
terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30,
39–78.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to
successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.
MAD SEARCH 13
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
24, 1467–1475.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus
similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively
defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 10, 32–39.
Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (1991). Toward an understanding of agerelated
memory and visual search effects. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 120, 131–149.
Fleck, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2007). Rare targets are rarely missed in
correctable search. Psychological Science, 18, 943–947.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of
attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion,
abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 20, 317–329.
Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli
capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 999–1010.
Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2005). The dynamic events that capture
visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ. Perception & Psychophysics,
67, 962–966.
Hillstrom, A. P., & Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional
capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399–411.
Horowitz, T. S., & Rich, A. N. (2007). Efficient segregation of moving and
stationary objects in visual search. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,
12, 12.
Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory.
Nature, 357, 575–577.
Hu¨bner, R., & Malinowski, P. (2001). How to produce an absent-advantage
in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 258–271.
Hulleman, J. (2009). No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual
search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 116–120.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s
movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and
performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements
in a “preattentive” feature search task. Nature, 387, 805–807.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.
Nature, 334, 430–431.
Kramer, A., Schneider, W., Fisk, A., & Donchin, E. (1986). The effects of
practice and task structure on components of the event-related brain
potential. Psychophysiology, 23, 33–47.
Kristjansson, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory
in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328–332.
Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). The role of memory
and restricted context in repeated visual search. Perception and Psychophysics,
70, 314–328.
Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003). Visual change
with moving displays: More evidence for color feature map inhibition
during preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 29, 779–792.
Kunar, M. A., Rich, A. N., & Wolfe, J. M. (2010). Spatial and temporal
separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual
search. Visual Cognition, 18, 881–897.
McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual-search for a conjunction
of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154–155.
McLeod, P., Driver, J., Dienes, Z., & Crisp, J. (1991). Filtering by movement
in visual-search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 17, 55–64.
Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2009). The cost of search for
multiple targets: Effects of practice and target similarity. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 125–139.
Menneer, T., Phillips, L., Donnelly, N., Barrett, D. J. K., & Cave, K. R.
(2004). Search efficiency for multiple targets. Cognitive Technology, 9,
22–25.
Nothdurft, H. C. (2000). Salience from feature contrast: Variations with
texture density. Vision Research, 40, 3181–3200.
Oliva, A., Wolfe, J. M., & Arsenio, H. C. (2004). Panoramic search: The
interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
30, 1132–1146.
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as
a result of “mudsplashes.” Nature, 398, 34–34.
Pinto, Y., Olivers, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). When is search for a static
target among dynamic distractors efficient? Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 59–72.
Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Selecting from
dynamic environments: Attention distinguishes between blinking and
moving. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 166–178.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H.
Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention & Performance X (pp. 531–
556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pylyshyn, Z. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated
vision, Cognition, 80, 127–158.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent
targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3,
179–197.
Rasche, C., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2010). Visual orienting in dynamic
broadband (1/f) noise sequences. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
72, 100–113.
Rauschenberger, R. (2003). When something old becomes something new:
Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29,
600–615.
Rich, A. N., Kunar, M. A., Van Wert, M., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Horowitz,
T., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the
boundaries of the low prevalence effect. Journal of Vision, 8(15), 1–17.
Schneider, W., & Fisk, A. (1982). Concurrent automatic and controlled
visual search: Can processing occur without resource cost? Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8, 261–
278.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human
information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological
Review, 84(1), 1–66.
Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture
attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics,
70, 208–218.
Smilek, D., Enns, J. T., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Relax!
Cognitive style influences visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 543–564.
Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2001). Multiple location inhibition of
return: When you see it and when you don’t. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1221–1237.
Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). The attentional boost effect:
Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a
second task. Cognition, 115, 118–132.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective
search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799–806.
Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces:
Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1016–1035.
Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Catelhano, M., & Henderson, J. M. (2006).
Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world
scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological
Review, 113, 766–786.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memo-
14 KUNAR AND WATSON
rial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–
237.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). Feature-integration theory of attention.
Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of
Experimental Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478.
Van Wert, M. J., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2009). Even in
correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 541–553.
Von Mu¨hlenen, A., Mu¨ller, D., & Mu¨ller, H. J. (2003). Sit-and-wait
strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science, 14, 309–
314.
Von Mu¨hlenen, A., Rempel, M., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Unique temporal
change is the key to attentional capture. Psychological Science, 16,
979–986.
Watson, D. G., Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Resisting
change: The influence of luminance changes on visual marking and the
preview benefit. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1526–1539.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Segmentation on the basis of
linear and local rotational motion: Motion grouping in visual search.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
25, 70–82.
Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A. (2010). Visual marking and change
blindness: Moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape
changes to ignored objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 36, 1391–1405.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?
Psychological Science, 9, 33–39.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An
alternative to the feature integration model for visual-search. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15,
419–433.
Wolfe, J. M., & Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992). On the role of symmetry in
visual search. Psychological Science, 3, 194–198.
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment
of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience,
5, 1–7.
Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., & Kenner, N. M. (2005). Rare items often
missed in visual searches. Nature, 435, 439–440.
Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Van Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S.,
& Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors
in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
136, 623–638.
Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Post-attentive vision. The
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
26, 693–716.
Wolfe, J. M., & VanWert, M. J. (2010). Varying target prevalence reveals
two, dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology, 20,
121–124.
Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience
and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., & Gibson, B. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and
attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182–204.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention:
Evidence from visual-search. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt visual
onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1505–
1513.