The Library

Instantaneous gelation in Smoluchowski’s coagulation equation revisited

Tools

Ball, Robin, Connaughton, Colm, Stein, Thorwald H. M. and Zaboronski, Oleg V.. (2011) Instantaneous gelation in Smoluchowski’s coagulation equation revisited. Physical Review E, Vol.84 (No.1). Article no. 011111. ISSN 1539-3755

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Ball_Instantaneous_Gelation.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1122Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011111

Abstract

We study the solutions of the Smoluchowski coagulation equation with a regularization term which removes clusters from the system when their mass exceeds a specified cutoff size, M. We focus primarily on collision kernels which would exhibit an instantaneous gelation transition in the absence of any regularization. Numerical simulations demonstrate that for such kernels with monodisperse initial data, the regularized gelation time decreasesas M increases, consistent with the expectation that the gelation time is zero in the unregularized system. This decrease appears to be a logarithmically slow function of M, indicating that instantaneously gelling kernels may still be justifiable as physical models despite the fact that they are highly singular in the absence of a cutoff. We also study the case when a source of monomers is introduced in the regularized system. In this case a stationary state is reached. We present a complete analytic description of this regularized stationary state for the model kernel, K(m1,m2)=max{m1,m2}ν, which gels instantaneously when M→∞ if ν>1. The stationary cluster size distribution decays as a stretched exponential for small cluster sizes and crosses over to a power law decay with exponent ν for large cluster sizes. The total particle density in the stationary state slowly vanishes as [(ν-1)logM]-1/2 when M→∞. The approach to the stationary state is nontrivial: Oscillations about the stationary state emerge from the interplay between the monomer injection and the cutoff, M, which decay very slowly when M is large. A quantitative analysis of these oscillations is provided for the addition model which describes the situation in which clusters can only grow by absorbing monomers.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

Q Science > QC Physics

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Centre for Complexity Science
Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Faculty of Science > Physics

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Coagulation -- Mathematical models

Journal or Publication Title:

Physical Review E

Publisher:

American Physical Society

ISSN:

1539-3755

Official Date:

11 July 2011

Dates:

Date	Event
11 July 2011	Published

Volume:

Vol.84

Number:

No.1

Page Range:

Article no. 011111

Identification Number:

10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011111

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

COST Action

Grant number:

MP0806 (COST Action)

Related URLs:

Other Repository

References:

[1] M. Ernst, in Fractals in Physics, edited by L. Pietronero
and E. Tosatti (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986) p. 289.
[2] M. V. Smoluchowski, Z. Phys. Chem. 91, 129 (1917).
[3] D. J. Aldous, Bernoulli 5, 3 (Feb. 1999).
[4] C. Connaughton, R. Rajesh, and O. Zaboronski, Physica
D 222, 97 (2006).
[5] G. Menon and R. L. Pego, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 57,
1197 (2004).
[6] M. H. Ernst and P. G. J. van Dongen, J.Stat. Phys. 1/2,
295 (1988).
[7] F. Leyvraz, Phys. Reports 383, 95 (Aug. 2003).
[8] A. A. Lushnikov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 236, 673
(1977).
[9] R. Zi, J. Stat. Phys. 23, 241 (1980).
[10] P. G. J. van Dongen and M. H. Ernst, J. Stat. Phys. 44,
785 (1986).
[11] A. Lushnikov, A. Negin, and A. Pakhomov, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 175, 138 (1990).
[12] E. M. Hendriks, M. H. Ernst, and R. M. Zi, J. Stat.
Phys. 31, 519 (1983).
[13] P. van Dongen, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 1889 (1987).
[14] J. Carr and F. P. da Costa, Zeit. Math, Phys. 43, 974
(1992).
[15] I. Jeon, J. Stat. Phys. 96, 1049 (1999).
[16] J. Silk and S. D. White, Astrophys. J. 223, L59 (1978).
[17] V. Kontorovich, Physica D 152{153, 676 (2001).
[18] V. I. Khvorostyanov and J. A. Curry, J. Atm. Sci. 59,
1872 (2002).
[19] P. Horvai, S. V. Nazarenko, and T. H. M. Stein, J. Stat.
Phys. 130, 1177 (2008).
[20] G. Falkovich, A. Fouxon, and M. G. Stepanov, Nature
419, 151 (2002).
[21] G. Falkovich, M. G. Stepanov, and M. Vucelja, J. Appl.
Met. Clim. 45, 591 (2006).
[22] A. A. Lushnikov, Phys. Rev. E 71, 046129 (2005).
[23] F. Filbet and P. Laurencot, Archiv der Mathematik 83,
558 (2004).
[24] C. Connaughton, Physica D 238, 2282 (2009).
[25] M. Lee, Icarus 143, 74 (2000).
[26] M. Lee, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 10219 (2001).
[27] M. Galassi, J. Davies, J. Theiler, B. Gough, G. Jungman,
P. Alken, M. Booth, and F. Rossi, GNU Scientific Library
Reference Manual - 3rd Edition (Network Theory Ltd.,
2009) ISBN 0-9546120-7-8.
[28] H. H. Rosenbrock, Comp. J. 3, 175 (1960).
[29] U. Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov
(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
[30] E. Ben-Naim and P. Krapivsky, Phys. Rev. E 68, 031104
(2003).
[31] C. Connaughton, R. Rajesh, and O. Zaboronski, Phys.
Rev. E 69, 061114 (2004).
[32] N. V. Brilliantov and P. L. Krapivsky, J. Phys. A Math.
Gen. 24, 4789 (Oct. 1991).
[33] P. Laurencot, Nonlinearity 12, 229 (Mar. 1999).
[34] J. Vollmer, G. K. Auernhammer, and D. Vollmer, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 98, 115701 (2007).
[35] I. J. Benczik and J. Vollmer, Europhys. Lett. 91, 36003
(2010).