Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space.

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Maylor, Elizabeth A. and Hockey, Robert. (1987) Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. Neuropsychologia, Vol.25 (No.1A). pp. 41-54. ISSN 0028-3932

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90042-X

Abstract

Three experiments are reported which investigate the possibility of habituation of externally-controlled covert orienting with repetition. A brief event in the visual field (for example, a luminance change) can speed the detection response to a target if it occurs in the same location within approx. 100 msec and can bias temporal order judgments in the absence of eye movements. This early facilitatory component is seen as the result of an externally-controlled covert orienting response, that is, the realignment of attention, but not the eyes, with the location of the initial event. However, after approx. 300 msec, the response to a target appearing in the same location is slower than to one appearing elsewhere (the inhibitory component). Experiment 1 employed a cue-target procedure, the subject's task being to ignore each non-informative cue but to respond as quickly as possible to the onset of each target. Three conditions were investigated which differed according to the number of consecutive cues presented in the same location [1, 5, 30]. Facilitatory and inhibitory components were present in all three, indicating that under these conditions, externally-controlled covert orienting does not habituate with repetition and occurs to non-random as well as random sequences of cues. In addition, there was evidence that the inhibitory component is larger for a response to a target appearing in the same location as the cue and the previous target than in the same location as the cue only. In order to investigate this further, a continuous target-target procedure was used in experiments 2 and 3 (simple and choice reaction time, with 3 and 1 response-stimulus intervals respectively), which demonstrated that inhibition does not build up over successive repetitions of targets appearing in the same location, but actually decreases. The results are discussed in relation to the possible functions of the facilitatory and inhibitory components in maintaining selectivity in visual space.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Visual perception, Orienting reflex , Attention
Journal or Publication Title: Neuropsychologia
Publisher: Pergamon
ISSN: 0028-3932
Date: 1987
Volume: Vol.25
Number: No.1A
Page Range: pp. 41-54
Identification Number: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90042-X
Status: Peer Reviewed
References: 1. R.J. Audley , Some observations on theories of choice reaction time: tutorial review. In: S. Kornblum, Editor, Attention and Performance IV, Academic Press, New York (1973). 2. J. Jonides , Voluntary vs reflexive control over the mind's eye's movement. In: Paper presented to the Psychonomic Society (1976). 3. J. Jonides , Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In: J.B. Long and A.D. Baddeley, Editors, Attention and Performance IX, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1981). 4. D. Kahneman , Attention and Effort. , Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1973). 5. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky , Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cognit. Psychol. 3 (1972), pp. 430–454. 6. S.W. Keele , Repetition effect: a memory-dependent process. J. exp. Psychol. 80 (1969), pp. 243–248. 7. N.H. Kirby , Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy?. J. exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2 (1976), pp. 567–577. 8. N.H. Kirby , Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In: A.T. Welford, Editor, Reaction Times, Academic Press, London (1980). 9. D.R.J. Laming , Subjective probability in choice-reaction experiments. J. mathemat. Psychol. 6 (1969), pp. 81–120. 10. E.A. Maylor , Components of orienting in visual space. , University of Durham (1983) Unpublished doctoral thesis . 11. E.A. Maylor and R. Hockey , Inhibitory component of externally-controlled covert orienting in visual space. J. exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 11 (1985), pp. 777–787. 12. E.A. Maylor , Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In: M.I. Posner and O.S.M. Marin, Editors, Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1985). 13. M.I. Posner , Orienting of attention. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 32 (1980), pp. 3–25. 14. M.I. Posner , Cumulative development of attentional theory. Am. Psychol. 37 (1982), pp. 168–179. 15. M.I. Posner and Y.A. Cohen , Consequences of visual orienting. In: Paper presented to the Psychonomic Society (1980). 16. M.I. Posner and Y.A. Cohen , Components of visual orienting. In: H. Bouma and D.G. Bouwhuis, Editors, Attention and Performance X, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1984). 17. M.I. Posner, Y.A. Cohen, L. Choate, R. Hockey and E.A. maylor , Sustained concentration: passive filtering or active orienting?. In: S. Kornblum and J. Requin, Editors, Preparatory States and Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1984). 18. M.I. Posner, Y.A. Cohen and R.D. Rafal , Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B298 (1982), pp. 187–198. 19. R.J. Remington , Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. J. exp. Psychol. 82 (1969), pp. 250–257. 20. R.W. Remington , Attention and saccadic eye movements. J. exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 6 (1980), pp. 726–744. 21. E. Soetens, M. Deboeck and J. Hueting , Automatic after-effects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts. J. exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 10 (1984), pp. 581–598. 22. E.N. Sokolov , Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. , MacMillan, New York (1963). 23. G.S. Tune , Response preferences: a review of some relevant literature. Psychol. Bull. 61 (1964), pp. 286–302. 24. W.A. Wagenaar , Subjective randomness and the capacity to generate information. Acta Psychologica 33 (1970), pp. 233–242.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35783

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us