Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Effects of alcohol, practice, and task complexity on reaction time distributions

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Maylor, Elizabeth A., Rabbitt, Patrick, James, G. H. and Kerr, S. A.. (1992) Effects of alcohol, practice, and task complexity on reaction time distributions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, Vol.44 (No.1). pp. 119-39. ISSN 0272-4987

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401286

Abstract

The effects of alcohol (1.0 ml/kg body weight) and practice (2 sessions) were investigated in 2-, 4-, and 8-choice reaction time (RT) tasks with 24 male subjects. The number of errors increased with alcohol, practice, and increasing task complexity (choice). Mean RT decreased with practice, but increased with alcohol and complexity. Both the alcohol and practice effects on mean RT increased as complexity increased. The effects of alcohol, practice, and complexity were all larger for the higher percentiles of the RT distributions than for the lower percentiles. RT distributions were further analysed at each level of choice by plotting percentiles (5th, 10th, ... , 95th) for alcohol conditions against corresponding percentiles for no-alcohol conditions, and percentiles obtained early in practice (Session 1) against those obtained later in practice (Session 2). These plots revealed that whereas at all levels of choice the effect of alcohol could be expressed as a simple linear transformation of all RTs, the effect of practice required a more complex curvilinear transformation. Thus, alcohol produces a general slowing of all RTs, whereas practice produces a disproportionate improvement at the slower end of the RT distribution.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Alcohol -- Physiological effect, Reaction time -- Effect of drugs on, Cognition -- Testing, Human information processing -- Effect of drugs on
Journal or Publication Title: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology
Publisher: Psychology Press
ISSN: 0272-4987
Date: 1992
Volume: Vol.44
Number: No.1
Page Range: pp. 119-39
Identification Number: 10.1080/14640749208401286
Status: Peer Reviewed
Funder: Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC)
Grant number: G8221479N (MRC)
References: * 1. Baron, A. and Journey, J. W. 1989. Age differences in manual versus vocal reaction times: Further evidence. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44: P157–159. * 2. Birnbaum, I. M. and Parker, E. S., eds. 1977. Alcohol and human memory Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. * 3. Cerella, J. 1985. Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98: 67–83. * 4. Falduto, L. L. and Baron, A. 1986. Age-related effects of practice and task complexity on card sorting. Journal of Gerontology, 41: 659–661. * 5. Ferris, S., Crook, T., Sathananthan, G. and Gershon, S. 1976. Reaction time as a diagnostic measure in senility. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 24: 529–533. * 6. Hick, W. E. 1952. On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4: 11–26. * 7. Huntley, M. S. Jr. 1972. Influences of alcohol and S-R uncertainty upon spatial localization time. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin), 27: 131–140. * 8. Huntley, M. S. Jr. 1973. Alcohol influences upon closed-course driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 5: 149–164. * 9. Huntley, M. S. Jr. 1974. Effects of alcohol, uncertainty and novelty upon response selection. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin), 39: 259–266. * 10. Hyman, R. 1953. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45: 188–196. * 11. Maylor, E. A. and Rabbitt, P. M. A. 1987. Effects of alcohol and practice on choice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 42: 465–475. * 12. Maylor, E. A. and Rabbitt, P. M. A. 1989. Relationship between rate of preparation for, and processing of, an event requiring a choice response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A: 47–62. * 13. Maylor, E. A., Rabbitt, P. M. A. and Connolly, S. A. V. 1989. Rate of processing and judgement of response speed: Comparing the effects of alcohol and practice. Perception & Psychophysics, 45: 431–438. * 14. Maylor, E. A., Rabbitt, P. M. A., James, G. H. and Kerr, S. A. 1990a. Comparing the effects of alcohol and intelligence on text recall and recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 81: 299–313. * 15. Maylor, E. A., Rabbitt, P. M. A., James, G. H. and Kerr, S. A. 1990b. Effects of alcohol and extended practice on divided-attention performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 48: 445–452. * 16. Maylor, E. A., Rabbitt, P. M. A., Sahgal, A. and Wright, C. 1987. Effects of alcohol on speed and accuracy in choice reaction time and visual search. Acta Psychologica, 65: 147–163. * 17. Miller, E. 1970. Simple and choice reaction time following severe head injury. Cortex, 6: 121–127. * 18. Moskowitz, H. and Burns, M. 1973. Alcohol effects on information processing time with an overlearned task. Perception & Motor Skills, 37: 835–839. * 19. Mowbray, G. H. and Rhoades, M. V. 1959. On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11: 16–23. * 20. Myerson, J., Hale, S., Wagstaff, D., Poon, L. W. and Smith, G. A. 1990. The information-loss model: A mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing. Psychological Review, 97: 475–487. * 21. Rabbitt, P. M. A. 1979a. “Current paradigms and models in human information processing”. In Human stress and cognition: An information processing approach Edited by: Hamilton, V. H. and Warburton, D. M. New York: Wiley. * 22. Rabbitt, P. M. A. 1979b. How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 70: 305–311. * 23. Rabbitt, P. M. A. and Banerji, N. 1989. How does very prolonged practice improve decision speed?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118: 338–345. * 24. Rabbitt, P. M. A. and Vyas, S. M. 1970. An elementary preliminary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT tasks. Acta Psychologica, 33: 56–76. * 25. Salthouse, T. A. 1985. A theory of cognitive aging Amsterdam: North-Holland. Check for fulltext * 26. Sternberg, S. 1969. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30: 276–315.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/35807

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us