Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Rational approximations to rational models : alternative algorithms for category learning

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sanborn, Adam N., Griffiths, Thomas L. and Navarro, Daniel J (2010) Rational approximations to rational models : alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, Vol.117 (No.4). pp. 1144-67. doi:10.1037/a0020511 ISSN 1939-1471.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-rational-models-algorithms-Sanborn-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1344Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020511

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Rational models of cognition typically consider the abstract computational problems posed by the environment, assuming that people are capable of optimally solving those problems. This differs from more traditional formal models of cognition, which focus on the psychological processes responsible for behavior. A basic challenge for rational models is thus explaining how optimal solutions can be approximated by psychological processes. We outline a general strategy for answering this question, namely to explore the psychological plausibility of approximation algorithms developed in computer science and statistics. In particular, we argue that Monte Carlo methods provide a source of rational process models that connect optimal solutions to psychological processes. We support this argument through a detailed example, applying this approach to Anderson's (1990, 1991) rational model of categorization (RMC), which involves a particularly challenging computational problem. Drawing on a connection between the RMC and ideas from nonparametric Bayesian statistics, we propose 2 alternative algorithms for approximate inference in this model. The algorithms we consider include Gibbs sampling, a procedure appropriate when all stimuli are presented simultaneously, and particle filters, which sequentially approximate the posterior distribution with a small number of samples that are updated as new data become available. Applying these algorithms to several existing datasets shows that a particle filter with a single particle provides a good description of human inferences.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Categorization (Psychology), Cognition, Monte Carlo method
Journal or Publication Title: Psychological Review
Publisher: American Psychological Association
ISSN: 1939-1471
Official Date: 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
2010Published
Volume: Vol.117
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 1144-67
DOI: 10.1037/a0020511
Status: Peer Reviewed
Date of first compliant deposit: 6 April 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 6 April 2017
Funder: National Science Foundation (U.S.), United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research
Grant number: IIS-0845410 (NSF), FA9550-07-1-0351 (AFOSR)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us