Kusev, P., Ayton, Peter, Van Schaik, P., Tsaneva-Atanasova, K., Stewart, Neil, 1974- and Chater, Nick. (2011) Judgments relative to patterns : how temporal sequence patterns affect judgments and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, Vol.37 (No.6). pp. 1874-1886. ISSN 0096-1523

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Six experiments studied relative frequency judgment and recall of sequentially presented items drawn from two distinct categories (i.e., city and animal). The experiments show that judged frequencies of categories of sequentially encountered stimuli are affected by certain properties of the sequence configuration. We find (a) a first-run effect whereby people overestimated the frequency of a given category when that category was the first repeated category to occur in the sequence and (b) a dissociation between judgments and recall; respondents may judge one event more likely than the other and yet recall more instances of the latter. Specifically, the distribution of recalled items does not correspond to the frequency estimates for the event categories, indicating that participants do not make frequency judgments by sampling their memory for individual items as implied by other accounts such as the availability heuristic (Tversky & Kahneman, 1973) and the availability process model (Hastie & Park, 1986). We interpret these findings as reflecting the operation of a judgment heuristic sensitive to sequential patterns and offer an account for the relationship between memory and judged frequencies of sequentially encountered stimuli.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Pattern perception, Categorization (Psychology), Memory, Human information processing, Time perception, Judgment
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	0096-1523
Date:	December 2011
Volume:	Vol.37
Number:	No.6
Page Range:	pp. 1874-1886
Identification Number:	10.1037/a0025589
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Anderson, N. H. (1965). Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 2, 1-9. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179. Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The hot-hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition, 32, 1369-1378. Brown, N. R. (1997). Context memory and the selection of frequency estimation strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 898-914. Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 12-21. Chater, N. (1996). Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organisation. Psychological Review, 103, 566-581. Garner, W. R. (1954). Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 218-224. Hampton, J.A., Estes, Z., & Simmons, C.L. (2005). Comparison and contrast in perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 1459-1476. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American psychologist, 39, 1372-1388. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268. Haubensak, G. (1992). The consistency model: A process model for absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18, 303- 309. Hertwig, R., Pachur, T., & Kurzenhäuser, S. (2005). Judgments of risk frequencies: Test of possible cognitive mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4, 621-642. Hock, H., Malcus, L., & Hasher, L. (1986). Frequency discrimination: Assessing globallevel and element-level units in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 232-240. Holland, M.K., & Lockhead, G.R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception and Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 409-414. Johnson, E.J., & Payne, J.W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science, 31, 394-414. Kusev, P., van Schaik, P., Ayton, P., Dent, J., & Chater, N. (2009). Exaggerated risk: Prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1487-1505. Lockhead, G. R. (1992). Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 543-601. Lockhead, G. R. (2004). Absolute judgments are relative: A reinterpretation of some psychophysical ideas. Review of General Psychology, 8, 265-272. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238. Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1-9. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57. Oskarsson, A. T., Van Boven, L., McClelland, G. H., & Hastie, R. (2009). What’s next? Judging sequences of binary events. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 262–285. Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407-418. Parducci, A., & Wedell, D. H. (1986). The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 496-516. Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198. Schneider, W., & Chein, J. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525-559. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66. Sedlmeier, P., & Betsch, T. (Eds.). (2002). Frequency processing and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2002). The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 893-907. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 3-11. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112, 881-911. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (2002). Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 21-36). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36029

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item