The Library
Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration
Tools
Tools
Tools
Matthews, William J., Stewart, Neil and Wearden, John H. (2011) Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37 (1). pp. 303-313. doi:10.1037/a0019961
|
PDF
WRAP-stimulus-intensity-perception-duration-Stewart-2011.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (898Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019961
Abstract
This article explores the widely reported finding that the subjective duration of a stimulus is positively related to its magnitude. In Experiments 1 and 2 we show that, for both auditory and visual stimuli, the effect of stimulus magnitude on the perception of duration depends upon the background: Against a high intensity background, weak stimuli are judged to last longer. In Experiment 3 we show that the effect of intensity becomes more pronounced at longer durations, consistent with the idea that stimulus intensity affects the pacemaker component of an internal clock, and that it is the difference of a stimulus from the background, rather than its absolute magnitude, which influences the rate of the pacemaker. These results urge a modification to the oft-repeated claim that more intense stimuli seem to last longer, and provide an important constraint on any model of human timing.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology | ||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Behavioural Science Faculty of Science > Psychology Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School |
||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Perception, Judgment, Stimulus intensity, Time perception | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance | ||||||
| Publisher: | American Psychological Association | ||||||
| ISSN: | 0096-1523 | ||||||
| Official Date: | February 2011 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 16 April 2020 | ||||||
| Volume: | 37 | ||||||
| Number: | 1 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 303-313 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.1037/a0019961 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Publisher Statement: | ©American Psychological Association, 2011. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019961 | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||
| Funder: | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | ||||||
| Grant number: | RES-000-23-1372 (ESRC) |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
