Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Emotional triangles : a test of emotion-based attentional capture by simple geometric shapes

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Watson, Derrick G. , Blagrove, Elisabeth and Selwood, Sally. (2011) Emotional triangles : a test of emotion-based attentional capture by simple geometric shapes. Cognition & Emotion, Vol.25 (No.7). pp. 1149-1164. ISSN 0269-9931

[img] PDF
WRAP_Watson_)CEM_139_10_Watson_Blagrove_Selwood_ACCEPTED.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 21 April 2013. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (163Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.525861

Abstract

Previous work has proposed that simple geometric shapes, carrying the features present within negative or threatening faces are especially effective at capturing or guiding attention. Here we test this account and provide converging evidence for a threat-based attentional advantage. Experiment 1 found that downward-pointing triangles continue to be detected more efficiently than upward-pointing triangles when: (i) both overall RT and search slope measures are obtained; and (ii) when the set size is varied and the stimuli are presented in random configurations. Experiment 2 tested and ruled out an alternative account of the selection advantage, based on differences between triangle shape consistencies with scene perspective cues. Overall, the data provide converging evidence that simple geometric shapes, which might be particularly important in providing emotional signals in faces, can also attract attention preferentially even when presented outside of a face context.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Visual perception, Triangles, Emotions, Affect (Psychology), Face perception
Journal or Publication Title: Cognition & Emotion
Publisher: Psychology Press
ISSN: 0269-9931
Date: 2011
Volume: Vol.25
Number: No.7
Page Range: pp. 1149-1164
Identification Number: 10.1080/02699931.2010.525861
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Blagrove, E., & Watson, D.G. (2010). Visual Marking and facial affect: Can an emotional face be ignored? Emotion.10, 147-168. Calvo, M.G., & Esteves, F. (2005). Detection of emotional faces: Low perceptual threshold and wide attentional span. Visual Cognition, 12, 13-27. Davoli, C.C., Suszki, J.W., & Abrams, R.A. (2007). New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 338- 343. Doherty, L.M., Foster, D.H. (2001). Reference frame for rapid visual processing of line orientation. Spatial Vision,14, 121-137. Eastwood, J., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P.M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004-1013. Eastwood, J.D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P.M. (2003). Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 352-358. Fenske, M.J., & Eastwood, J.D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327-343. Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R.J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14, 61-92. Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16 (3), 335-379. Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R.J., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681-700. Frischen, A., Eastwood, J.D., & Smilek, D. (2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 662-676. Georgiou, G.A., Bleakley, C., Hayward, J., Russo, R., Dutton, K., Eltiti, S and Fox, E. (2005). Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces. Visual Cognition, 12, 145-158. Gerritsen, C., Frischen, A., Blake, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Visual search is not blind to emotion, Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1047-1059. Horstmann, G., & Becker, S. I. (2008). Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary? Perception & Psychophysics,70,1416-1434. Howell, D.C. (2007). Statistics methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. Johnson, M.H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 266-274. Juth, P., & Lundqvist, D., Karlsson, A., & Öhman, A. (2005). Looking for foes and friends: Perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. Emotion, 5, 379-395. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M.M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311. Lappin, J.S., Shelton, A.L. & Rieser, J.J. (2006). Environmental context influences visually perceived distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 571-581. Larson, C.,L., Aronoff, J., Sarinopoulos, I.C., & Zhu, D.C. (2008). Recognizing threat: A simple geometric shape activates neural circuitry for threat detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1523-1535. Larson, C.L., Aronoff, J., & Stearns, J.J. (2007). The shape of threat: Simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. Emotion, 7, 526-534. LeDoux, J. E. (1998). Fear and the brain: Where we have been, and where are we going? Biological Psychiatry 44, 1229-1238. LeDoux, J.E. (1996) The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster. Lundqvist, D., Esteves, F., & Öhman, A. (2004). The face of wrath: The role of features and configurations in conveying social threat. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 161 - 182 Marendaz, C. (1998). Nature and dynamics of reference frames in visual search for orientation: Implications for early visual processing. Psychological Science, 9, 27- 32. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001) Fears, phobias and preparedness: Towards an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483-522. Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 381–396. Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45, 75-92. Sagiv, N., & Bentin, S. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937- 951. Schubö, A., Gendolla, G.H.E., Meinecke, C. & Abele, A.E. (2006). Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search paradigm: Are faces special? Emotion, 6, 246- 256. Tipples, J., Atkinson, A. P., Young, A. W. (2002). The eyebrow brown: A salient social signal. Emotion, 2, 288-296. Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer vision, Graphics, and Image processing, 31, 156-177. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-319. Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R.J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 829-841. Watson, D.G. & Humphreys, G.W. (1997). Visual Marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122. Watson, D.G., & Humphreys, G.W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962. White, M. (1995) Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 439-460. Williams, M.A., Moss, S.A., Bradshaw, J. L., Mattingley, J.B. (2005). Look at me, I’m smiling: Visual search for threatening and non-threatening facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 12, 29-50. Wolfe, J. M. (1998a). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-74). Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press. Wolfe, J.M. (1998b). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-38. Wolfe, J.M. (1992). “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research, 32, 757-763. Wolfe, J.M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 381-389. Wright, C.I., Martis, B., Shin, L.M., Fischer, H., & Rauch, S.L. (2002). Enhanced amygdala responses to emotional versus neutral schematic facial expressions. NeuroReport, 13, 785-789. Yantis, S. & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 10, 601-621. Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A.P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36112

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us