Revisiting preview search at isoluminance : new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage
Braithwaite, Jason J., Humphreys, Glyn W., Watson, Derrick G. and Hulleman, Johan, 1968- . (2005) Revisiting preview search at isoluminance : new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception and Psychophysics, Vol.67 (No.7). pp. 1214-1228. ISSN 0031-5117Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193554
It has been argued that search performance underpreview conditions relies on automatic capture by luminance onsets (Donk & Theeuwes, 2001). We present three experiments in which preview search was examined with both isoluminant and nonisoluminant items (e.g., as defined by luminance onsets). Experiment 1 provided evidence against the automatic capture of attention by onsets. Search benefited when onset previews were followed by new onset stimuli, as compared with a full-set baseline matched for the number of new onsets but in which half the distractors appeared simultaneously at isoluminance. Furthermore, both Experiments 1 and 2 established a preview advantage when isoluminant targets followed onset previews, when compared with appropriate full-set baselines. Experiment 3 replicated this result, while showing that the preview benefit was disrupted by dual-task interference. The data indicate that new onsets are not necessary to generate a preview advantage in search. We discuss the data in terms of search’s benefiting from active inhibition of old onset-defined stimuli.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
|Divisions:||Faculty of Science > Psychology|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Visual perception, Light, Inhibition, Human information processing, Brightness perception|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Perception and Psychophysics|
|Publisher:||Springer New York LLC|
|Official Date:||October 2005|
|Page Range:||pp. 1214-1228|
|Funder:||Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC)|
Actions (login required)