Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Revisiting preview search at isoluminance : new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Braithwaite, Jason J., Humphreys, Glyn W., Watson, Derrick G. and Hulleman, Johan, 1968- . (2005) Revisiting preview search at isoluminance : new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception and Psychophysics, Vol.67 (No.7). pp. 1214-1228. ISSN 0031-5117

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193554

Abstract

It has been argued that search performance underpreview conditions relies on automatic capture by luminance onsets (Donk & Theeuwes, 2001). We present three experiments in which preview search was examined with both isoluminant and nonisoluminant items (e.g., as defined by luminance onsets). Experiment 1 provided evidence against the automatic capture of attention by onsets. Search benefited when onset previews were followed by new onset stimuli, as compared with a full-set baseline matched for the number of new onsets but in which half the distractors appeared simultaneously at isoluminance. Furthermore, both Experiments 1 and 2 established a preview advantage when isoluminant targets followed onset previews, when compared with appropriate full-set baselines. Experiment 3 replicated this result, while showing that the preview benefit was disrupted by dual-task interference. The data indicate that new onsets are not necessary to generate a preview advantage in search. We discuss the data in terms of search’s benefiting from active inhibition of old onset-defined stimuli.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Visual perception, Light, Inhibition, Human information processing, Brightness perception
Journal or Publication Title: Perception and Psychophysics
Publisher: Springer New York LLC
ISSN: 0031-5117
Date: October 2005
Volume: Vol.67
Number: No.7
Page Range: pp. 1214-1228
Identification Number: 10.3758/BF03193554
Status: Peer Reviewed
Funder: Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36126

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us