Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A comparison of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontiers as methods for assessing the efficiencies of organisational units

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Read, Laura Elizabeth (1998) A comparison of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontiers as methods for assessing the efficiencies of organisational units. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_THESIS_Read_1998.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (8Mb)
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1364577~S1

Abstract

This thesis gives an overall view of the two most commonly used approaches for measuring the relative efficiencies of organisational units. The two approaches, data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontiers (SF), are supposedly estimating the same underlying efficiency values but the natures of the two methods are very different. This can lead to different estimates for some, or all, of the units in an analysis. By identifying the nature of these differences this work shows that it is possible to gain some insight into the nature of the underlying data and to say more confidently which of the two estimates is closer to the true efficiency for individual units. In order to investigate the differences between the methods across different facets of the technology two important dimensions are chosen. Firstly differences across scale size are investigated. It is shown how it is possible to define a measure of scale size in both the single output and multiple input and output cases. This measure of scale size can then be used to split the technology into regions of differing scale size enabling, for example, tests for the true nature of returns to scale in DEA. The measure of scale size developed in multiple dimensions necessitates a method for estimating an homothetic, constant returns to scale function. Differences between the approaches across input mix are also investigated. These differences may highlight the abilities of the methods to correctly identify the elasticity of substitution between the inputs. The results of the comparisons between the methods are summarised. This summary gives possible reasons for differences which may be found between the results of the two approaches, and an indication of what the nature of the estimates may be to the true efficiency values. An algorithm is then developed for using a comparison of the results from the two methods to help to identify the better estimates.

Item Type: Thesis or Dissertation (PhD)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Data envelopment analysis, Industrial efficiency, Organization
Date: September 1998
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Warwick Business School
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Thanassoulis, Emmanuel
Extent: xx, 272 leaves
Language: eng
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36370

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us