The Library
Global food security and the governance of modern biotechnologies
Tools
Tait, Joyce and Barker, Guy C.. (2011) Global food security and the governance of modern biotechnologies. EMBO reports, Vol.12 (No.8). pp. 763-768. ISSN 1469-221X
|
PDF
WRAP_Barker_0170657-lb-250711-wrap_barker_tait_5-incl_jt_review.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (222Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.135
Abstract
Food security has become an issue of serious concern because global food supplies are threatened by systemic collapse. Increasing demand for food caused by global population growth, changing lifestyles in developing countries, climate change and competition with biofuels are combining to create a ‘perfect storm’ (Godfray et al, 2010). Moreover, short-term weather patterns leading to floods and droughts - and associated fires - in major grain-producing areas of the world encourage speculation in agricultural commodities and cause wild price fluctuations. Drastic price hikes for staple foods during the past few years have triggered famine and revolts in developing countries, where people are hit hardest (Henn, 2011).
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Food security, Biotechnology -- Government policy, Agricultural innovations |
| Journal or Publication Title: | EMBO reports |
| Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group |
| ISSN: | 1469-221X |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Volume: | Vol.12 |
| Number: | No.8 |
| Page Range: | pp. 763-768 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1038/embor.2011.135 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| References: | Anon (2010) Q&A: What will it take to feed the world. Nature, 464, 969 (15 April 2010). Chataway, J., Wield, D. and Tait, J. (2008) Correspondence, Nature Biotechnology, 26(5), (May 2008), 500. Dewar, A.M., May, M.J., Woiwod, I.P., Haylock, L.A., Champion, G.T., Garner, B.H., Sands, R.J.N., Qi, A. and Pidgeon, J.D. (2003) A novel approach to the use of generically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proc. Roy. Soc. B; 270, 335-340. EFSA (2010) Scientific opinion: guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal, 8(11), 1879 (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1879.htm) (accessed 11/05/11). FSA (2010) Food: the Use of Genetic Modification – a public dialogue. Agreed Title, Aims and Objectives. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/gmaimsobj.pdf (accessed 21 Feb., 2011) Godfray, H.C.J, Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L, Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S.M., and Toulmin, C. (2010) Food Security: the Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Science, 327, 12 February 2010, 812-818. Haseloff, J. and Ajioka, J. (2009) Synthetic biology: history, challenges and prospects. J. R. Soc. Interface, 6, S389-S391. Henn M (2011) The speculator's bread: what is behind rising food prices? EMBO reports 12: 296 - 301 INRA and CIRAD (2009) Agrimonde: scenarios challenges for feeding the world in 2050. Summary Report, December 2009. http://www.international.inra.fr/the_institute/foresight/agrimonde (accessed 27 Feb. 200911) INRA (2010) Europe launches major joint research effort to ensure food security in the face of climate change and rising demand. INRA Press Release 10/6/2010 \\hsskhyber.hss.ed.ac.uk\ssps\HOME\etait\Publications\EMBO-Agriculture&Governance\INRA - Press release Europe launches major joint research effort.htm (accessed 28 Feb., 2011) James, C. (2010) ISAAA Brief 42-2010: Executive Summary. Global Statistics of Commercialised Biotech/GM Crops: 2010. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/42/executivesummary/ (accessed 5 Mar, 2011) Jiao, Y., Wang, Y., Xue, D., Wang, J., Yan, M., Liu, G. Dong, G., Zeng, D., Lu, Z., Zhu, X., Qian, Q., and Li, J. (2010) Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice, Nature Genetics, 42(7), 541-544 Kuiper, H.A. and Davies H.V. (2010) The SAFE FOODS Risk Analysis Framework suitable for GMOs? A Case Study. Food Control, 21, 1662-1676. Lyall, C. and Tait, J. (2005) New Modes of Governance: Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science, Technology, Risk and the Environment. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. von Moltke, K., (1987) The Vorsorgeprinzip in West German Environmental Policy. London: The Institute for European Environmental Policy. National Research Council (2010) The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the US. National Research Council: Committee on the Impact of Biotechnology on Farm-Level Economics and Sustainability. National Academies Press, http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12804 (accessed 12/05/11) Park, J.R., McFarlane, I., Phipps, R.H and Ceddia, G. (2011) The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 9, 2-21. Pielke, R.A., (2007). The Honest Broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 7 and 15-18. RCEP (1989) Thirteenth Report: The release of genetically engineered organisms to the environment. London: HMSO, Cmd 720, 1989. Schaart,J.G. and Visser, R.G.F. (2009) Novel Plant Breeding Techniques COGEM Report, University of Wageningen, pp 60. http://www.cogem.net/ContentFiles/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20New%20plant%20breeding%20techniques%20definitieve%20versie1.pdf (accessed 5 Mar, 2011) Smythe, S., Gusta, M., Belcher, K., Phillips, P. and Castle D. (2011, in press) Changes in Herbicide Use Following the Adoption of HT Canola in Western Canada. Weed Technology Stilgoe J (2006) Between People and Power: nongovernmental organisations and public engagement. In: Turney J (Ed.) Engaging Science: thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. London, UK: Wellcome Trust, pp 62-67. Sunstein, C.R. (2009) Going to Extremes: how like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press, p 140. Tait, J. and Levidow, L. (1992) Proactive and Reactive Approaches to Risk Regulation: the Case of Biotechnology, Futures, April, 1992, pp 219-231. Tait, J. (2001a) Science, Governance and Multifunctionality of European Agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, 30(2), pp 91-95. Tait, J. (2001b) More Faust than Frankenstein: the European Debate about Risk Regulation for Genetically Modified Crops. Journal of Risk Research, 4(2), 175-189. Tait, J. (2007) Systemic Interactions in Life Science Innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19(3), 257-277, May 2007. Tait, J. (2009) Upstream Engagement and the Governance of Science: the shadow of the GM crops experience in Europe. EMBO Reports. Vol 10, Special Issue, pp 18-22 The Government Office for Science (2011) Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming. Executive Summary. London: The Government Office for Science. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/bispartners/foresight/docs/food-and-farming/11-546-future-of-food-and-farming-report.pdf) (addressed 10/05/11) Wamae, W., Goyal-Rutsaert, P., Morgan Jounes, M., NiChonnaill, S., Tait, J., and Chataway, J., (2011, submitted to BBSRC). Knowledge Exchange and Translational Research in Agriculture and Food. RAND Europe; Report Prepared for BBSRC and DEFRA, 23 March 2011, TR-986-BD. Willis, T. (2010) EU Joint Programming: Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change (FACCE-JPI). UKRO Conference, July 2010.http://www.ukro.bbsrc.ac.uk/annual_conference/2010/presentations/100701_jpi_willis.pdf (accessed 6th Feb., 2011). |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36438 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

