The Library

School governing bodies in England under pressure : the effects of socio-economic context and school performance

Tools

James, Chris, 1949-, Brammer, Stephen, Connolly, Michael, Fertig, Mike, James, Jane and Jones, Jeff (Jeff L.). (2011) School governing bodies in England under pressure : the effects of socio-economic context and school performance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol.39 (No.4). 414 - 433. ISSN 1741-1432

[img] PDF (Version received does not comply with publishers policy)
James,_Brammer,_James,_Connolly,_Fertig_(2011)_EMAL.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (193Kb)

Abstract

This article reports research into the nature and functioning of school governing bodies in different socio-economic and performance contexts. The research analysed 5000 responses from a national questionnaire-based survey and undertook 30 case studies of school governing. The research confirmed that school governing in England is a complex and onerous responsibility that places governing bodies under considerable pressure. The socio-economic and performance contexts can be particularly demanding additional pressures. Governing bodies interact with those contexts in a complex way which we explain using the notions of governance capital and governance agency. Governance capital is the network of individuals and their capabilities, relationships and motivations that are available for the governing of a school. It is likely to be greater for schools that: are well regarded; are in high socio-economic status settings; and have high levels of pupil attainment. These effects may add and mutually reinforce creating an ‘amplifier effect’, which may significantly impact on the governing of a school. Governance agency is the capacity of those involved in the governing of a school to act. It is significant; can ameliorate the effects of low governance capital; and complicates the relationship between governing, performance and socio-economic context.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): School management and organization -- England, School boards -- England, Education -- Economic aspects -- England, Education -- Social aspects -- England, Academic achievement -- England
Journal or Publication Title: Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 1741-1432
Official Date: July 2011
Volume: Vol.39
Number: No.4
Page Range: 414 - 433
Identification Number: 10.1177/1741143211404258
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: CfBT Education Trust
References:

Balarin M, Brammer S, James CR, and McCormack M (2008) The School Governance Study. London:
Business in the Community.
Brookover W, Beady C, Flood P, Schweitzer J and Weisenbaker J (1979) School Social Systems and Student
Achievement: Schools can make a Difference. New York: Praeger.
Bush T and Gamage D (2001) Models of self-governance in schools: Australia and the United Kingdom.
International Journal of Educational Management 15: 39–44.
Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94:
S95–S120.
DCSF (2008) About the National Challenge. Available at: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/nationalchallenge/
about.shtml
DCSF (2009a) A Guide to the Law for School Governors. London: DCSF.
DCSF (2009b) Your Child, Your Schools, Our Future: Building a 21st Century School System. London:
DCSF.
Dean C, Dyson A, Gallannaugh F, Howes A and Raffo C (2007) School Governors and Disadvantage.
London: Joseph Rowntree.
Deem R, Brehony K and Heath S (1995) Active Citizenship and the Governing of Schools. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
DfE (2010a) The Importance of Teaching. London: DfE.
DfE (2010b) School Improvement Partner (SIP) programme. http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/
node/186547
DfES (2003) School Governance Constitution. London: Stationery Office.
DfES (2007) School Governance (Constitution). London: Stationery Office.
Earley P (2003) Leaders or followers? Governing bodies and their role in school leadership. Educational
Management Leadership & Administration 31(4): 353–367.
Ellis A (2003) Barriers to Participation for Under-represented Groups in School Governance. DfES
Research Report RR500. London: DfES.
Farrell C (2005) Governance in the UK public sector: the involvement of the governing board. Public Administration
83(1): 89–110.
Field J (2003) Social Capital. London: Routledge.
James CR, Connolly M, Dunning G and Elliott T (2006) How Very Effective Primary Schools Work. London:
SAGE.
James CR, Brammer S, Connolly M, Fertig M, James J and Jones J (2010) The ‘Hidden Givers’: A Study of
School Governing Bodies in England. Reading: CfBT.
James et al.: School Governing Bodies in England Under Pressure 431.
Kaldor N (1990) Capital accumulation and economic growth. In: Lutz FA and Hague DC (eds) The Theory of
Capital. London: Keys and Fernandez, 177–222.
Nahapiet J and Ghosal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The
Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242–266.
Ofsted (2010a) The Evaluation Schedule for Schools. London: Ofsted.
Ofsted (2010b) School inspections: A guide for parents and carers. Available at: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/
content/download/9969/115279/file/
School%20inspections%20a%20guide%20for%20parents%20and%20carers%20Sept%2010.doc
Ofsted (2010c) Self evaluation and the SEF. Available at: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Formsand-
guidance/Browse-all-by/Education-and-skills/Schools/Self-evaluation-and-the-SEF
Ofsted/DCFS (2010) Welcome to RAISE online: reporting and analysis for improvement through school selfevaluation.
Available at: https://www.raiseonline.org/Login.aspx
Portes A (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology
24: 1–24.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2007) Independent Study into School Leadership. London: DCSF.
Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
Ranson S (2008) The changing governance of education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership
36(2): 201–219.
Ranson S, Arnott M, McKeown P, Martin J and Smith P (2005a) The participation of volunteer citizens in
school governance. Education Review 57(3): 357–371.
Ranson S, Farrell C, Penn N and Smith P (2005b) Does governance matter for school improvement. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement 16(3): 305–325.
Rutter M, Maughan B, Mortimore P and Ouston J, with Smith A (1979) Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary
Schools and Their Effects on Children. London: Open Books.
Scanlon M, Earley P and Evans J (1999) Improving the Effectiveness of School Governing Bodies. London:
Department for Education and Employment.
SGOSS (2010) About the School Governors’ One-Stop Shop. Available at: http://www.sgoss.org.uk/about-us/
Teachernet (2010) Grants for schools. Available at: http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/atoz/g/
Grants_for_schools/
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36554

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...