Brammer, Stephen, Pavelin, Stephen and Porter, Lynda A.. (2009) Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, Vol.46 (No.4). 575 - 596. ISSN 0022-2380

PDF (Version received does not comply with publishers policy) Brammer,_Pavelin_&_Porter_(2009)_JMS.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (124Kb)

Abstract

This paper investigates the degree to which corporate charitable giving is influenced by a firm's internationalization and/or whether it has operations in one or more countries of concern. For a sample of large UK firms, we find evidence of a positive effect not for internationalization per se, but only for a presence in particular countries. In this connection, the salient country characteristic is a lack of political rights and/or civil liberties, and the positive impact on charitable giving is restricted to a presence in only those countries that are, according to Freedom House indicators, most lacking in this respect. Furthermore, our study highlights a mode of corporate response to stakeholder concerns and pressures – offsetting – that is qualitatively different from those suggested in earlier conceptual literatures.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Corporations -- Charitable contributions -- Great Britain, International business enterprises, Social responsibility of business, Globalization, Corporate image
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Management Studies
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:	0022-2380
Date:	June 2009
Volume:	Vol.46
Number:	No.4
Page Range:	575 - 596
Identification Number:	10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00827.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Adams, M. and Hardwick, P. (1998). ‘An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence’. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641–54. Banerjee, B. (2001). ‘Corporate citizenship and indigenous stakeholders: exploring a new dynamic of organisational–stakeholder relationships’. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 39–55. Becker-Olson, K. L., Cudmore, B. A. and Hill, R. P. (2006). ‘The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior’. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53. Brammer, S. J. and Millington, A. I. (2004). ‘The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: a stakeholder analysis’. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1411–34. Brammer, S. J. and Millington, A. I. (2005). ‘Corporate reputation and philanthropy: an empirical analysis’. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 29–44. Brammer, S. J. and Pavelin, S. (2005). ‘Corporate community contributions in the United Kingdom and the United States’. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 15–26. Brammer, S. J. and Pavelin, S. (2006). ‘Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit’. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 435–55. Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S. and Porter, L. A. (2006a). ‘Corporate social performance and geographical diversification’. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1025–34. Brammer, S. J., Williams, G. A. and Zinkin, J. (2006b). ‘Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample’. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 229–43. Brammer, S. J., Millington, A. I. and Rayton, B. (2007). ‘The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organisational commitment’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1701–19. Brown, W. O., Helland, E. and Smith, J. K. (2006). ‘Corporate philanthropic practices’. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 855–77. Carroll, A. B. (2004). ‘Managing ethically with global stakeholders: a present and future challenge’. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 114–20. Caruso, E. F. and Singh, J. B. (2003). ‘The content and focus of the codes of ethics of the world’s largest transnational corporations’. Business and Society Review, 108, 71–94. Chauvin, K. W. and Hirschey, M. (1993). ‘Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm’. Financial Management, 22, 128–40. Christian Aid (2004). Behind the Mask: The Real Face of Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Christian Aid. Christmann, P. (2004). ‘Multinational companies and the natural environment: determinants of global environmental policy standardization’. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 747–60. Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2001). ‘Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm selfregulation in China’. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 439–58. Click, R. W. (2005). ‘Financial and political risks in US direct foreign investment’. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 559–75. Daly, H. (1994). ‘Fostering environmentally sustainable development: four parting suggestions for the World Bank’. Ecological Economics, 10, 183–7. Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. de Jongh, D. (2004). ‘A stakeholder perspective on managing social risk in South Africa: responsibility or accountability?’. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 15, 27–31. Deephouse, D. L. and Carter, S. M. (2005). ‘An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation’. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 329–60. 594 S. J. Brammer et al. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. (1995). ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990). ‘What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–58. Freedom House (2003). Freedom in the World 2003. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. FTSE (2003). FTSE4Good Index Series: Inclusion Criteria. FTSE International Limited. Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J. and Krause, T. (1995). ‘Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874–907. Gnyawali, D. R. (1996). ‘Corporate social performance: an international perspective’. Advances in International Comparative Management, 11, 251–73. Godfrey, P. (2005). ‘The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective’. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–98. Graves, S. B. and Waddock, S. A. (1994). ‘Institutional owners and social performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–46. Greider, W. (1997). One World, Ready or Not. New York: Simon and Schuster. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van Riel, C. B. M. and van den Bosch, F. A. J. (2004). ‘Reputation management capabilities as decision rules’. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1349–77. Heugens, P. P. M. A., Kaptein, R. M. and van Oosterhout, J. (2008). ‘Contracts to communities: a processual model of organizational virtue’. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 100–21. Hillman, A. J. and Keim, G. D. (2001). ‘Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: what’s the bottom line?’. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–39. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). ‘Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry’. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–71. Howell, L. D. (2001). The Handbook of Country and Political Risk Analysis, 3rd edition. East Syracuse: The PRS Group. Husted, B. (2005). ‘Culture and ecology: a cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability’. Management International Review, 45, 349–71. Johnson, R. D. and Greening, D. W. (1999). ‘The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–76. Jones, T. M. (1995). ‘Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–37. Jones, T. M. and Wicks, A. C. (1999). ‘Convergent stakeholder theory’. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206–22. Korten, D. (1995). When Corporations Rule the World. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999). ‘Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise’. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81. Lockett, A.,Moon, J. and Visser, W. (2006). ‘Corporate social responsibility in management research: focus, nature, salience and sources of influence’. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 115–36. Logsdon, J. M. and Wood, D. J. (2002). ‘Business citizenship: from domestic to global level of analysis’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 155–88. Logsdon, J. M. and Wood, D. J. (2005). ‘Global business citizenship and voluntary codes of ethical conduct’. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 55–67. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A. and Schneewiess, T. (1988). ‘Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance’. Academy of Management Review, 31, 854–72. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S. and Wright, P. M. (2006). ‘Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications’. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18. Meznar, M. and Nigh, D. (1995). ‘Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs in American firms’. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 975–96. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. and Wood, D. J. (1997). ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of whom and what really counts’. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–86. Orlitzky, M. (2001). ‘Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance?’. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 167–80. Palley, T. I. (2002). ‘The child labour problem and the need for international labor standards’. Journal of Economic Issues, 36, 601–15. Peterson, D. K. (2004). ‘The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment’. Business and Society, 43, 296–319. Corporate Charitable Giving 595 Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row. Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2002). ‘The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy’. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–68. Post, J. E. (1985). ‘Assessing the nestle boycott: corporate accountability and human rights’. California Management Review, 27, 113–31. Post, J. E. (2002). ‘The “Iron Law” of business responsibility revisited: lessons from South Africa’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 265–76. Rowley, T. and Berman, S. (2000). ‘A brand new brand of corporate social performance’. Business and Society, 39, 397–418. Rugman, A. M. and Verbeke, A. (1998). ‘Corporate strategy and international environmental policy’. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 819–33. Ryan, L. V. and Schneider, M. (2002). ‘The antecedents of institutional investor activism’. Academy of Management Review, 27, 554–73. Saiia, D. H. (2001). ‘Corporate citizenship and corporate philanthropy: strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship’. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 1–19. Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B. and Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). ‘Philanthropy as strategy: when corporate charity begins at home’. Business and Society, 42, 169–201. Schrage, E. (2003). ‘Emerging threat: human rights claims’. Harvard Business Review, 81, 16–18. Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). ‘Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility’. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–44. Shah, S. Z. A. and Akbar, S. (2007). ‘Value relevance of advertising expenditure: a review of the literature’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 301–25. Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M. and Tihanyi, L. (2004). ‘A model of global and institutional antecedents of high-level corporate environmental performance’. Business and Society, 43, 6–36. Simerly, R. L. (1997). ‘Corporate social performance and multinationality: an empirical examination’. International Journal of Management, 14, 699–703. Simerly, R. L. and Li, M. (2000). ‘Corporate social performance and multinationality: a longitudinal study’. B>Quest: A Journal of Applied Topics in Business and Economics, http://www.westga.edu/~bquest/2000/ corporate.html Social Investment Forum (2006). ‘2005 report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States’. SIF Industry Research Program, http://www.socialinvest.org/. Sparkes, R. and Cowton, C. J. (2004). ‘The maturing of socially responsible investment: a review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 45–57. Strike, V. M., Gao, J. and Bansal, P. (2006). ‘Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms’. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 850–62. Transparency International (2002). Transparency International Annual Report 2002. Berlin: Transparency International. Turban, D. B. and Greening, D. W. (1997). ‘Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees’. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–72. Vernon, R. (1992). ‘Transnational corporations: where are they coming from, where are they headed?’. Transnational Corporations, 1, 7–35. Vernon, R. (1998). In the Hurricane’s Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B. (1997). ‘The corporate social performance–financial performance link’. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–19. Williams, G. A. (2007). ‘Some determinants of the socially responsible investment decision: a cross country study’. Journal of Behavioural Finance, 8, 43–57. Williams, R. J. and Barrett, J. D. (2000). ‘Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity and firm reputation: is there a link?’. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 341–50. Windsor, D. (2006). ‘Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches’. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114. Wood, D. J. (1991). ‘Corporate social performance revisited’. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36559

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item