Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Taking the power of ideas seriously – the case of the United Kingdom's 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kettell, Steven, 1973- and Cairney, Paul. (2010) Taking the power of ideas seriously – the case of the United Kingdom's 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. Policy Studies, Vol.31 (No.3). pp. 301-317. ISSN 0144-2872

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01442871003615943

Abstract

To ‘take ideas seriously’ is to recognise the symbiotic relationship between power and the role of ideas, rather than explain policy primarily in terms of influence and material interest. Yet, this statement alone does not take us very far. The definition and ‘independent effect’ of ideas is open to question, while explanations based on power may compete with, as well as supplement, explanations based on ideas. This article addresses these issues in two ways. First, it explores the role of ideas in the public policy literature. Second, it examines the potency of ideas through an analysis of the UK government's 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. Although widely seen as a battle of ideas competing to be translated into policy action, the Bill's progression cannot be sufficiently explained with reference to ideas or political power alone. Rather, both ideas and power relations need to be taken into account when considering the causes of policy change.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > J General legislative and executive papers
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Policy science, Bills, Legislative -- Great Britain, Bills, Legislative -- Moral and ethical aspects, Fetus -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Policy Studies
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 0144-2872
Date: 2010
Volume: Vol.31
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 301-317
Identification Number: 10.1080/01442871003615943
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/36614

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us