Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference
Simmons, Sabrina and Estes, Zachary, 1973-. (2008) Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference. Cognition, Vol.108 (No.3). pp. 781-795. ISSN 0010-0277
WRAP_estes_Ind_Diffs.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.003 ...
Thematically related concepts like coffee and milk are judged to be more similar than thematically unrelated concepts like coffee and lemonade. We investigated whether thematic relations exert a small effect that occurs consistently across participants (i.e., a generalized model), or a large effect that occurs inconsistently across participants (i.e., an individualized model). We also examined whether difference judgments mirrored similarity or whether these judgments were, in fact, non-inverse. Five studies demonstrated the necessity of an individualized model for both perceived similarity and difference, and additionally provided evidence that thematic relations affect similarity more than difference. Results suggest that models of similarity and difference must be attuned to large and consistent individual variability in the weighting of thematic relations.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Science > Psychology|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Cognition, Selectivity (Psychology)|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Cognition|
|Date:||21 August 2008|
|Page Range:||pp. 781-795|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93. Barsalou, L. W. (1989). Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 76-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bassok, M., & Medin, D. L. (1997). Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 311–336. Beck, J. (1966). Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 300-302. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307. Estes, Z. (2003). A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science 27, 911–921. Estes, Z. & Hasson, U. (2004). The importance of being nonalignable: A critical test of the structural alignment theory of similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1082-1092. Gati, I. & Tversky, A. (1984). Weighting common and distinctive features in conceptual and perceptual judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 341-370. Gentner, D. & Brem, S. K. (1999). Is snow really similar to a shovel? Distinguishing similarity from thematic relatedness. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 179-184). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Gentner, D. & Gunn, V. (2001). Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences. Memory & Cognition, 29, 565-577. Gentner, D. & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158. Gentner, D. & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56. Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157. Hampton, J. A., Estes, Z., & Simmons, S. (2007) Metamorphosis: Essence, appearance and behavior in the categorization of natural kinds. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1785-1800. Jones, M. & Love, B. (2007). Beyond common features: The role of roles in determining similarity. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 196-231. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (2002). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211- 240. Lassiter, G. D., Briggs, M. A., & Slaw, R. D. (1991). Need for cognition, causal processing, and memory for behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 694–699. Levin, I. P., Huneke, M. E., & Jasper, J. D. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion–exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 171–193. Lin, E. L. & Murphy, G. L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 3-28. Markman, A. B. & Gentner, D. (1993a). Splitting the difference: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 517-535. Markman, A. B. & Gentner, D. (1993b). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467. Markman, E. M. & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1990). Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and difference are not inverses. Psychological Science, 1, 64-69. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278. Murphy, G. L. (2001). Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 834-839. Navarro, D. & Lee, M. (2004). Common and distinctive features in stimulus similarity: A modified version of the contrast model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 961-974. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation Simmons, S. & Estes, Z. (2008). Dual processes of comparison and integration in similarity and difference. Manuscript under review. Smiley, S. S. & Brown, A. L. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 249-257. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. Wisniewski, E. J. & Bassok, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 208-238.|
Actions (login required)