Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Why do additional presentations help us identify a stimulus?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Adelman, James S., Guest, Duncan and Kent, Christopher (2009) Why do additional presentations help us identify a stimulus? In: Experimental Psychology Society, Leicester, UK, 15-17 Apr 2009

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Nosofsky (1983) reported that additional stimulus presentations within a trial increase discriminability in absolute identification, suggesting that each presentation creates an independent stimulus representation, but it remains unclear whether exposure duration or the formation of independent representations improves discrimination in such conditions. Experiment 1 replicated Nosofsky’s result. Experiments 2 (masking the ISI between two presentations) and 3 (manipulating stimulus duration without changing number of presentations or overall trial duration) ruled out an explanation in terms of extended opportunities for stimulus sampling, from either a sensory buffer during additional ISIs or increased stimulus exposure, respectively. Experiment 4 (comparing two and three presentations, other factors controlled) provided some limited additional support for Nosofsky’s original claim that additional stimulus presentations can create either independent or duplicate representations. Experiments 5 and 6 (both manipulating ISI) demonstrated that a key factor in the additional stimulus presentation effect is the overall trial duration. We discuss the results in relation to mode ls of absolute identification, their relative emphasis on stimulus sampling versus response selection, and
the mechanisms by which duplicate representations could be created.

Item Type: Conference Item (Paper)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Human information processing -- Research, Psychology, Experimental
Official Date: April 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
April 2009Available
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Version or Related Resource: Examination of: Nosofsky, R.M. (1983). Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and criterial noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 299-309.
Conference Paper Type: Paper
Title of Event: Experimental Psychology Society
Type of Event: Other
Location of Event: Leicester, UK
Date(s) of Event: 15-17 Apr 2009

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us