Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The impact of chest compression rates on quality of chest compressions : a manikin study

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Field, Richard A., Soar, Jasmeet, Davies, Robin P., Akhtar, Naheed and Perkins, Gavin D.. (2012) The impact of chest compression rates on quality of chest compressions : a manikin study. Resuscitation, Vol.83 (No.3). pp. 360-364. ISSN 03009572

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Perkins_The_impact_of_chest_compression_rates_on_quality_of_chest_compressions_-_a_manikin_study_Final.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (229Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07....

Abstract

Purpose Chest compressions are often performed at a variable rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The effect of compression rate on other chest compression quality variables (compression depth, duty-cycle, leaning, performance decay over time) is unknown. This randomised controlled cross-over manikin study examined the effect of different compression rates on the other chest compression quality variables. Methods Twenty healthcare professionals performed two minutes of continuous compressions on an instrumented manikin at rates of 80, 100, 120, 140 and 160min-1 in a random order. An electronic metronome was used to guide compression rate. Compression data were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and are presented as mean(SD). Non-parametric data was analysed by Friedman test. Results At faster compression rates there were significant improvements in the number of compressions delivered (160(2) at 80min-1 vs. 312(13) compressions at 160min-1, P<0.001); and compression duty-cycle (43(6)% at 80min-1 vs. 50(7)% at 160min-1, P<0.001). This was at the cost of a significant reduction in compression depth (39.5(10)mm at 80min-1 vs. 34.5(11)mm at 160min-1, P<0.001); and earlier decay in compression quality (median decay point 120s at 80min-1 vs. 40s at 160min-1, P<0.001). Additionally not all participants achieved the target rate (100% at 80min-1 vs. 70% at 160min-1). Rates above 120min-1 had the greatest impact on reducing chest compression quality. Conclusions For Guidelines 2005 trained rescuers, a chest compression rate of 100 to 120min-1 for two minutes is feasible whilst maintaining adequate chest compression quality in terms of depth, duty-cycle, leaning, and decay in compression performance. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the Guidelines 2010 recommendation for deeper and faster chest compressions.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Cardiac resuscitation -- Methodology
Journal or Publication Title: Resuscitation
Publisher: Elsevier Science BV
ISSN: 03009572
Date: 21 March 2012
Volume: Vol.83
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 360-364
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.012
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR), Resuscitation Council (UK)
References: 1. Edelson DP, Abella BS, Kramer-Johansen J, et al. Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2006;71:137-45. 2. Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 1. Executive Summary. Resuscitation 2010;81:1219-76. 3. Perkins GD, Boyle W, Bridgestock H, et al. Quality of CPR during advanced resuscitation training. Resuscitation 2008;77:69-74. 4. Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005;111:428-34. 5. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299-304. 6. Feneley MP, Maier GW, Kern KB, et al. Influence of compression rate on initial success of resuscitation and 24 hour survival after prolonged manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation 1988;77:240-50. 7. Christenson J, Andrusiek D, Everson-Stewart S, et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009;120:1241-7. 8. Standards and guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC). National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council. JAMA 1986;255:2905-89. 9. Handley AJ, Koster R, Monsieurs K, Perkins GD, Davies S, Bossaert L. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2005;67 Suppl 1:S7-23. 10. 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 2: Adult basic life support. Resuscitation 2005;67:187-201. 11. Koster RW, Sayre MR, Botha M, et al. Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 2010;81 Suppl 1:e48-70. 12. Koster RW, Baubin MA, Caballero A, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2010;81:1277-92. 13. Kramer-Johansen J, Edelson DP, Losert H, Kohler K, Abella BS. Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resuscitation 2007;74:406-17. 14. Perkins GD, Augré C, Rogers H, Allan M, Thickett DR. CPREzy™: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed. Resuscitation 2005;64:103-8. 15. Bellamy RF, DeGuzman LR, Pedersen DC. Coronary blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Circulation 1984;69:174-80. 16. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:305-10. 17. Perkins GD, Benny R, Giles S, Gao F, Tweed MJ. Do different mattresses affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Intensive Care Med 2003;29:2330-5. 18. Jantti H, Silfvast T, Turpeinen A, Kiviniemi V, Uusaro A. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins. Resuscitation 2009;80:453-7. 19. Rawlins L, Woollard M, Williams J, Hallam P. Effect of listening to Nellie the Elephant during CPR training on performance of chest compressions by lay people: randomised crossover trial. BMJ 2009;339:b4707. 20. Handley AJ, Handley JA. The relationship between rate of chest compression and compression:relaxation ratio. Resuscitation 1995;30:237-41. 21. Yeung J, Meeks R, Edelson D, Gao F, Soar J and Perkins GD. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: A systematic review. Resuscitation 2009;80:743-51. 22. Sugerman NT, Edelson DP, Leary M, Weidman EK, Herzberg DL, Vanden Hoek TL, et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation 2009;80:981-4.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/37168

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us