Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Serial lung function variability using four portable logging meters

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Moore, Vicky C., Parsons, Nicholas R., Jaakkola, Maritta S., Burge, Cedd B.S.G., Pantin, Charles F., Robertson, Alastair S. and Burge, P. Sherwood. (2009) Serial lung function variability using four portable logging meters. Journal of Asthma, Vol.46 (No.9). pp. 961-966. ISSN 0277-0903

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02770900903229677

Abstract

Objective. Portable lung function logging meters that allow measurement of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) are useful for the diagnosis and exclusion of asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the within and between-session variability of PEF and FEV1 for four logging meters and to determine the sensitivity of meters to detect FEV1 and PEF diurnal changes. Methods. Thirteen assessors (all hospital staff members) were asked to record 1 week of 2-hour PEF and FEV1 measurements using four portable lung function meters. Within-session variability of PEF and FEV1 were compared for each meter using a coefficient of variation (COV). Between-session variability was quantified using parameter estimates from a cosinor analysis which modeled diurnal change for both lung function measures and also allowed for variation between days for individual sessions. Results. The mean within-session COV for FEV1 was consistently lower than that for PEF (p < 0.001). PEF showed a higher but not significantly different (p = 0.068) sensitivity for detecting diurnal variation than FEV1. PEF was also slightly more variable between days, but not significantly different than FEV1 (p = 0.409). PEF and FEV1 diurnal variability did not differ between the 4 meters (p = 0.154 and 0.882 respectively), but within-session FEV1 COV differed between meters (p = 0.009). Conclusion. PEF was marginally more sensitive to within-day variability than FEV1 but was less repeatable. Overall, differences between the 4 meters were small, suggesting that all meters are clinically useful.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Pulmonary function tests, Respiration -- Measurement, Asthma
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Asthma
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
ISSN: 0277-0903
Date: November 2009
Volume: Vol.46
Number: No.9
Page Range: pp. 961-966
Identification Number: 10.3109/02770900903229677
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/37287

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us