The Library

Head up, foot down : object words orient attention to the objects' typical location

Tools

Estes, Zachary, 1973-, Verges, Michelle and Barsalou, Lawrence W.. (2008) Head up, foot down : object words orient attention to the objects' typical location. Psychological Science, Vol.19 (No.2). pp. 93-97. ISSN 0956-7976

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Estes_Estes_Verges__Barsalou.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (138Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02051.x

Abstract

Many objects typically occur in particular locations, and object words encode these spatial associations. We tested whether such object words (e.g., head, foot) orient attention toward the location where the denoted object typically occurs (i.e., up, down). Because object words elicit perceptual simulations of the denoted objects (i.e., the representations acquired during actual perception are reactivated), we predicted that an object word would interfere with identification of an unrelated visual target subsequently presented in the object's typical location. Consistent with this prediction, three experiments demonstrated that words denoting objects that typically occur high in the visual field hindered identification of targets appearing at the top of the display, whereas words denoting low objects hindered target identification at the bottom of the display. Thus, object words oriented attention to and activated perceptual simulations in the objects' typical locations. These results shed new light on how language affects perception.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Imagery (Psychology), Perception -- Research, Spatial behavior
Journal or Publication Title:	Psychological Science
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:	0956-7976
Official Date:	5 February 2008
Volume:	Vol.19
Number:	No.2
Page Range:	pp. 93-97
Identification Number:	10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02051.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59. Berger, A., Henik, A., & Rafal, R. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 207-221. Craver-Lemley, C., & Arterberry, M. E. (2001). Imagery-induced interference on a visual detection task. Spatial Vision, 14, 101-119. Craver-Lemley, C., & Reeves, A. (1992). How visual imagery interferes with vision. Psychological Review, 99, 633-649. Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360-365. Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94, B79-B89. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 176-180. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147. Langton, S. R. H., Watt, R. J., & Bruce, V. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 50-59. Head Up, Foot Down 13 Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Houwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174. Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517-524. Richardson, D. C., & Spivey, M. J. (2000). Representation, space, and Hollywood Squares: Looking at things that aren’t there anymore. Cognition, 76, 269-295. Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767-780. Šetić, M., & Domijan, D. (2007). The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 297-312. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156. Vandenberghe, R., Price, C., Wise, R., Josephs, O., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996). Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. Nature, 383, 254-256. Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611-619. Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 954-958.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/373