Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Risk-adjusted scoring systems can predict surgeons’ performance in colorectal surgery

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Leung, Edmund, Ferjani, Ali M., Kitchen, Andrew, Griffin, Damian R., Stallard, Nigel and Wong, Ling S.. (2011) Risk-adjusted scoring systems can predict surgeons’ performance in colorectal surgery. Surgeon, Vol.9 (No.1). pp. 3-7. ISSN 1479666X

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.008

Abstract

Introduction: The Physiological & Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) was derived from a heterogeneous general population and has been used successfully as an audit tool to provide risk-adjusted operative mortality rate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether risk-adjusted scoring systems can accurately predict outcomes of colorectal operations done by colorectal and non-colorectal surgeons. Method: The study was conducted prospectively on 899 consecutive patients who underwent major elective and emergency colorectal procedures over three years between 2002 and 2004 at University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire. The outcome parameter was defined as 30-day mortality. The observed mortality was then compared to POSSUM-predicted mortality. Hosmer–Lemeshow and Fisher’s Exact test were used to assess statistical significance in outcome between non- and coloproctologists. Results: CR-POSSUM was the most accurate predictive model for outcomes of major colorectal operations between surgeons. The overall mortality rate amongst coloproctologists was 7% (5% elective & 13% emergency), whereas the overall mortality was 17% (3% elective & 21% emergency) in non-coloproctologists. Conclusion: CR-POSSUM was the better prediction model than POSSUM. Coloproctologists delivered a significantly lower overall mortality, but not in the emergency setting. However, given the few number of elective colorectal resections performed by non-coloproctologists, more cases are required to permit meaningful comparison for the outcomes of major colorectal operations among different surgeons.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Colon (Anatomy) -- Surgery -- Complications, Colon (Anatomy) -- Surgery -- Risk factors, Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Mortality, Rectum -- Surgery -- Complications, Surgeons -- Evaluation, Mortality -- Forecasting, Outcome assessment (Medical care)
Journal or Publication Title: Surgeon
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
ISSN: 1479666X
Date: February 2011
Volume: Vol.9
Number: No.1
Page Range: pp. 3-7
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.008
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/37345

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us